Showing posts with label Medical humanities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Medical humanities. Show all posts

Monday, October 23, 2023

Photography and the Medical Humanities

 From the 4/9/2021 edition of the Transformational Times



Photography and the Medical Humanities







Carlyle Chan, MD



Dr. Chan served on the AAMC Arts and Humanities Integration Committee that drafted the FRAHME (Fundamental Role of Arts and Humanities in Medical Education) report. He shares how a deeper dive into the humanities, and photography in particular, can teach physicians to be better observers and help “defy acceleration” in their lives …


“The arts teach creative means of expression, understanding of different perspectives, an awareness of knowledge and emotions throughout the human experience, and the sharing of perceptions through artistic creation and practices in the expressive world.”

“The humanities teach close reading practices as an essential tool, an appreciation for context across time and space, qualitative analysis of social structures and relationships, the importance of perspective, the capacity for empathic understanding analysis of the structure of an argument…”

-NASEM 2018


Similar to the NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine) report, the object of the AAMC FRAHME (Fundamental Role of Arts and Humanities in Medical Education) initiative was to “improve the education, practice, and well-being of physicians through deeper integrative experiences with the arts and humanities.”

Photography is a visual art that consists of many sub-categories including, but not limited to, landscape, fine art, portrait, street, food, and photojournalism.  Like other visual arts a photograph can evoke very different personal responses from each individual viewing an image.  Photographer Minor White utilizes the term Equivalence to describe this response.   In psychiatry, we might describe this as a form of transference.  That is, we bring our past experiences into our present-day life.  

For the photographer, photographs have a magical element.  In a fleeting moment, a person can preserve a scene in perpetuity.  As the saying goes, “Take a picture.  It lasts longer.”  However, the camera is not as sensitive as the human eye.  With the exception of photojournalism, adjusting an image after capturing one (a.k.a. postproduction) allows the photographer the creative freedom to better represent what was seen in the mind’s eye.  This is not unlike a painter who may add clouds and move objects to improve a scene’s composition.  Both these activities, picture taking and postproduction, are creative processes.  The former requires, among other skills, powers of observation, perspective taking, composition, and appreciation of lighting.  The latter includes the same skill sets plus technical ones to help develop the final product.  

It has been said that one way to relieve stress is to find an activity that defies acceleration.  Taking and processing photos does slow down the pace of life.  One views and studies the scene to be captured and similarly views and studies the image to be rendered.  Engaging in photography not only provides a diversion from the demands of clinical practice and a respite from life pressures, but also an outlet for creative endeavors.  Photographs are another vehicle for implementing Visual Thinking Strategies while helping avoid burnout.  Parenthetically, the best camera to have is the one you have with you, be it a professional grade SLR or one on a smartphone.  Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, photography is fun.



Carlyle Chan, MD, is Professor and Vice Chair for Professional Development and Educational Outreach in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine at MCW. 


Monday, October 2, 2023

The Transformational Times is Taking a Sabbatical (although the blog will continue)






The Transformational Times is Taking a Sabbatical



Adina Kalet, MD, MPH




Born on the fly to keep our medical community thoughtfully connected through the pandemic, the Transformational Times--like the rest of the world--is establishing its “new normal.” To do this, we are pausing weekly publication to gather reader input and intentionally consider how best to serve our community while continuing to reflect the transformational work at the Medical College of Wisconsin around character and caring alongside clinical excellence. Dr. Kalet shares what will happen behind the scenes, and invites readers to help shape the future of this thoughtful, medical education publication by participating in our survey ...
 


Dear Readers,

September is a time for renewal. Kids are back in school, the summer has come to an end, and in my faith, we gather to celebrate the birth of the world through our “high holy days.” At the Kern Institute we have been taking time to reflect and plan. We spent a day in retreat a couple of weeks ago, to contemplate where we have been and consider where are going next. In that spirit, the Transformational Times team is taking a short sabbatical to refresh our processes, update our vision and begin again.
 
The Transformational Times was born during the first days of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, when the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW) sent all of the students and many faculty and staff members home. As I have recounted before, we decided to transition our existing quarterly newsletter into a weekly offering, and rename it the Transformational Times. We hoped this would keep our work alive and support our medical education community.
 
As those early weeks turned into months then years, we kept up our pace, publishing 178 weekly issues of the Transformational Times and two curated books. We have taken only a handful of holiday weeks “off.” We are proud we have helped people share personal stories about their work and worlds. The tagline to be “delivering stories of hope, community, caring and resilience to our community,” has largely been honored.
 
The Transformational Times has been a success in many ways. We have grown our readership both inside and outside of MCW and received a great deal of supportive feedback and a few critical comments; we take all of our feedback very seriously. Through these efforts, we have hosted a hardy, broad conversation around the transformation of medical education and accelerated the expansive acceptance at MCW and beyond of new models for educating physicians that embody the character and caring essential to health and health care. This is the mission of the Kern Institute.
 

What to expect in the future

With the pandemic largely in the rear-view mirror, we are taking a break to reimagine the Transformational Times. Over the next few weeks, under the leadership of our new Co-Editors-in-Chief Wendy Peltier, MD and Himanshu Agrawal, MD, we will seek input from our readers. Our Editorial Board will ensure we continue to prioritize creating community and encouraging storytelling that promotes the ideas and discourse at the heart of health professions education.
 
Drs. Peltier and Agrawal will do this work along with our multidisciplinary editorial board which includes Bruce Campbell, MD (founding Editor-in-Chief); Kathlyn Fletcher, MD; Adina Kalet, MD, MPH; Karen Herzog (Milwaukee-based journalist); Justine Espisito, (Kern Institute staff); Joy Wick, (Kern Institute Communications Consultant); William Graft. Jr., MD (Resident, Internal Medicine/Psychiatry); and medical students Julia Bosco, Linda Nwumeh, Wolf Pulsiano, Sophie Voss and Emelyn Zaworski.
 
Our immediate goals are to work with Kern Institute members and the MCW leadership to:
  • Refine our processes, policies, and submission guidelines
  • Publish regular, theme-based issues that engage broad swaths of our community
  • Leverage our Philosophies of Medical Education Transformation Lab (PMETaL) to build a civil discourse framework that enables diverse and profound conversations about our professions
  • Have our editing team, including two former journalists, actively assist and encourage writers of all comfort levels
  • Explore more flexible publishing platforms (video, audio, social formats, etc.)
  • Integrate our work with the Kern Institute Podcast Network
 
We plan to continue and expand popular features of the Transformational Times, including:
  • Themed issues for special days (e.g., Veteran’s Day, Valentine’s Day, Thanksgiving) and events in the medical education year (e.g., The White Coat Ceremony, Match Day, Graduation)
  • Programmatic reports from the Institute, including The Learner Continuum Hub, Educator Development Hub, and the Medical Education Data Science, Human Centered Design, and the Philosophies of Medical Education Transformation labs
  • Project reports from the Transformational Innovations (TI2), KINETIC3, and the MCWFusion curriculum, including Learning Communities, The Good Doctor Course, the Character and Professionalism Thread, and Learning Dashboards
  • Works-in-progress on medical school to residency transitions, character measurement, and professional identity formation
  • Summaries of Qualitative Research Methods, the Kern Institute Collaboration Scholarship (KICS) group journal clubs and collaborations, the Medical Education Matters Podcast, and our Medical Education Transformation book series
  • Collaboration reports with Academic Affairs, the MCW Affiliated Hospitals (MCWAH) GME programs, MCW-Central Wisconsin, MCW-Green Bay, Thrive on King, the School of Pharmacy, the Physician Assistants Program, Genetic Counselling, Anesthesia Assistant Program, and the Graduate School
  • Reflection on and coverage of the emerging issues of our times

Please Provide Input

While we won’t be publishing for a few weeks, we will be accepting submissions, and we encourage you to reach out to us with your ideas.
 
We want to hear from you! Whether this is your first or your 178th time reading the Transformational Times, please provide us feedback by taking our survey. If you have advice, opinions, or critiques, please reach out with your thoughts and feelings during this time. And thank you for reading, sharing, and caring.
 
In the meanwhile, watch this space for announcements of our Kern Institute events and related content.


Sincerely,






Adina Kalet, MD MPH is the Director of the Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Institute for the Transformation of Medical Education and holder of the Stephen and Shelagh Roell Endowed Chair at the Medical College of Wisconsin.

Friday, March 24, 2023

Images from MCW's Spring 2023 MedMoth

MCW's Spring 2023 MedMoth


Thanks to all of our particiapnts, leaders, audience members, and sponsors (The Charles E. Kubly Foundation and the Kern Institute) for a great evening of storytelling, learning, and community. 

It was an evening that celebrated character, caring, flourishing, and practical wisdom.



 



 Brett Linzer, MD

Mohan Dhariwal, DO, PhD


Jon Lehrmann, MD


Shannnon Majewski, CMP, CMM, HMCC, VEMM



David Hotchkiss


Amber Y Bo


Chrystal Amini-Hajibashi


Meg Summerside


Emily Daly


Corey Briska


Linda Nwumeh



Adina Kalet, MD, MPH


Thursday, February 9, 2023

13,000 Days on the Hamster Wheel: Finding Meaning on the Way to Retirement


Adapted from a version in the 8/21/2020 issue of the Transformational Times

 

 



13,000 Days on the Hamster Wheel: Finding Meaning Before and After Retirement

 

 

Bruce H Campbell, MD, FACS 

 


In this essay first published in the Transformational Times in 2020, Dr. Campbell reflects on how the self-care trajectory on which we place our students and residents will carry them beyond their careers …

 

Medicine differs from many other professions. Once a physician joins a practice, it is possible to become a perpetual-motion machine, working day-after-day, seeing patients and generating revenue. As long as the physician directly or indirectly generates enough cash flow to pay salaries, keep the lights on, and move the enterprise forward, the process can continue unabated. Theoretically, this hamster-on-a-wheel activity can continue for around 13,000 days. That’s thirty-five years. Then the hamster retires, and another is recruited to keep the wheel turning. 

Of course, I don’t usually view myself, our students, or our residents as hamsters, but there have been days when the thought crossed my mind. Still, what can medical educators do to prepare the next generation of physicians in ways that will enrich – rather than deaden – their lives and careers? And how do we help our trainees step back and begin to grasp the arc of their journeys from graduation to retirement?

 

Talking with trainees about their careers

A couple of years ago, I held a session on retirement with our otolaryngology residents. We read an article where the authors asked brand-new Johns Hopkins internal medicine interns to write down and then share what they thought a colleague would say about them at their retirement celebration many years down the road. I asked our residents to do the same. We also discussed which of their character strengths would be most noticeable in their careers (from the list at www.viacharacter.org/), what they think they will miss about their careers after they retire, and what aspects of retirement they are thinking about now. 

Not surprisingly, the Hopkins medical interns in the article and our MCW otolaryngology residents all see the distance from where they are now to retirement as being an incredibly long time. The brand-new interns hoped that their colleagues would see that they had lived out their core values, been accomplished in their careers, and been good teammates. Among possible character traits, our residents hope that they would have been most admired for their dedication to teamwork and their humility. They anticipate that they will find their greatest personal satisfaction–and what they think they will miss the most–from being part of a team focused on helping others in times of great need. Like the interns in the study, our residents worried about retirement but, being so far off in the future, they could not imagine what it will feel like to get there.

 Our otolaryngology residents did differ from the internal medicine interns. Although they know they will miss many things, they believed they will be able to replace professional relationships, the joy of helping others, and stimulating conversations with other post-retirement activities. As surgeons, though, they worried that they will have difficulty replacing the unique privilege of performing surgery. As one resident said, “I can’t imagine not operating again. That’s why we went into this.” Many agreed. 

 Our otolaryngology residents, who had been in training much longer than the brand-new interns in the Hopkins study, focused on how quickly time passes, even in training. “I am already realizing how much I will miss my fellow residents,” one of senior resident noted. “I’m sure my career will seem to pass by just as quickly.”

 

The challenges of helping students, residents, and faculty gain insight into themselves and others

There are data that strong relationships and lifelong self-care habits can yield benefits much later in life. MCW faculty members and the Kern Institute are building a portfolio of curricular and extracurricular opportunities that encourage resilience and insight.  The challenge is to make these types of offerings available, appealing, and effective. Baking caring and self-care into the institutional culture and the curriculum creates opportunities for both transformation and scholarship. 


But, let’s get real 

Finding time for reflection, creativity, and long-range personal planning is difficult and, frankly, of low priority for busy students, residents, and faculty. Institutions can readily measure clinic slots, RVUs, grant funding, and fiscal margins, but we don’t (yet) have metrics that measure sustained empathy, strengthened character, prevented suicides, and successful prevention of burnout. If we cannot demonstrate that these habits can be nurtured, or if they aren’t seen as valuable, our interventions will have little impact and won’t be sustained. 

Yet, raise your hand if you think that a graduate who is unprepared to thrive in practice will suffer needlessly over the coming decades. 

  

Retirement isn’t for sissies

Over the years I have been at MCW, dozens of colleagues have retired. The end of a career rarely goes exactly as planned. Some have retired amid accolades for lives and careers well-spent while others have left baffled and reluctant, having no idea what they would be doing a week later. Some, after long and productive careers, were forced out after bitter disputes. Some packed up and left in disgrace. Some became ill or died before they had the opportunity to retire. Some, unfortunately, held on too long. Some left huge holes in the institution when they retired. Others barely caused a ripple. 

 Guiding our students and trainees toward rewarding careers and eventual retirements carries responsibility. We must do more than suggest they be financially responsible and keep track of their retirement account outlook. We have equally important responsibilities to help them develop well-rounded professional identities, “seize the day” mentalities, and careers as reflective, empathic, and mindful physicians. If they enter practice self-aware and focusing on character, caring, and practical wisdom, they should have a better chance of emerging into retirement possessing the same values. 

 

Living each day

The act of living intentionally came to mind when I read a story in an interview with Duke University’s director of medical humanities, theologian, and pediatric oncologist, Raymond Barfield, MD: 

 “Think of each day as a gold coin that you are required to trade for something. You’ll never get that coin back, so whatever you trade it for had better be worth it. You also don’t know how many coins you have left to trade, and you don’t know what will happen when your bag is empty.”

My career shot past me like a rocket since I completed my fellowship and joined the MCW faculty 12,945 days ago. I now wish I had learned early on to treat each day like a gold coin. 

As I look back on my clinical practice, there were too many “hamster on a wheel” days. Still, I am grateful for the moments when a colleague or mentor, some of whom have died, encouraged me to take advantage of the self-care and reflective skills I acquired along the way. It helped. A lot.

Here is hoping we all learn to pay it forward. Your retirement will be here before you know.

 

Bruce H Campbell, MD, FACS, is a Professor in the Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences and in the Institute for Health and Equity (Bioethics and Medical Humanities) at MCW. He is on the Faculty Pillar of The Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Institute for the Transformation of Medical Education. He serves on the editorial board of the Transformational Times

 

Thursday, December 15, 2022

The Kern Institute Announces Publication of the Second Collection of Transformational Times Essays

 Book Presale - Character and Caring: Medical Education Emerges From the Pandemic




The Kern Institute Announces Publication of the Second Collection of Transformational Times Essays


Medical students, residents, physicians, and caregivers have struggled during the pandemic. The times in which we live will transform medicine. These essays, drawn from the Kern Institute’s Transformational Times newsletter, offer glimpses into what we have experienced and what might yet come.


Each essay reveals remarkable insights and reflects the interplay of the world we inhabit with the present and future of medicine and healthcare.


"Incredibly timely."

—Carol Bradford, MD FACS

“[This book] provides an unparalleled opportunity to bring one’s best self to the bedside and looks for the unexpected opportunities to impact the world.”

—Jesse Ehrenfeld, MD, MPH

“...a ready-made syllabus to embrace social, psychological, spiritual, and humanistic dimensions of medical education.”

—Louis N. Pangaro, MD, MACP

“...the art, as well as the science, of medicine are eloquently delivered, provoking the reader to reflect and see the world from new perspectives.”

J. Larry Jameson, MD, PhD


In these pages, readers engage with unsettling realities unmasked by COVID-19, including workplace biases, inattention to wellness, residency-related stress, the loneliness of military responsibility, the inequity of the world around us, reproductive healthcare uncertainty, new educational realities, and the imperative for flourishing and practical wisdom in physicians.


To purchase a copy of Character and Caring: Medical Education Emerges From the Pandemic, click here


To purchase a copy of our our first book, Character and Caring: A Pandemic Year in Medical Education, click here.






Thursday, April 15, 2021

Opening the Drawer

From the 4/16/2021 newsletter


Medical Humanities reflection


Opening the Drawer


 Amy Domeyer-Klenske, MD


Dr. Domeyer-Klenske write about how engagement in the humanities makes students and residents better doctors, active listeners and more resilient humans …



I have long been interested at the intersection of humanities and medicine and felt challenged in my efforts to braid them together. I recall my enthusiasm to become a Doctor/Writer when I was a medical student and had an opportunity to interact with physician authors at the Examined Life Conference, held annually at University of Iowa. In one of these conversations, I was told I could put my writing interest in a metaphorical drawer during residency. I could allow myself to focus intensively on my training with the plan to re-open the drawer when I’d completed training. I left the conversation feeling a sense of freedom; I didn’t feel guilt or pressure to be too many things at once. Instead of Doctor/Writer I could just be Doctor.

I proceeded throughout my training giving little thought to writing. I’ve since reflected on this advice and my decision to follow it. I’m certain that I write less now than I did as a student. I wonder if something was lost in the drawer, if recovering interests becomes more difficult the longer they are locked away. 

I had the opportunity to share this advice and discuss strategies for remaining active in the humanities with Dr. Zack Schoppen, an OB/gyn resident, and a group of students during the M4 Humanities Elective on March 24, 2021. 

We discussed how the metaphorical drawer can be freeing when we are stressed. Alternatively, we discussed the option of planned engagement and disengagement where we use our time to actively check in on our humanities interests (writing a poem or an essay, reading a novel) but also allow ourselves time to actively “check out” (binge-watch television, nap, spend time with family and friends). The second strategy allows ongoing engagement, but on our own terms. 

This conversation refreshed me. I hope it did the same for our students. Inevitably, becoming a “good doctor” isn’t solely about how many articles you read or how much time you spend in the hospital. Engagement in the humanities can make us better doctors, active listeners and more resilient humans.



Amy Domeyer-Klenske is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at MCW. 



Holding a Virtual Storytelling Event: MCW’s MedMoth

From the 4/16/2021 newsletter


Holding a Virtual Storytelling Event: MCW’s MedMoth


Scott Lamm - MCW-Milwaukee Class of 2022


Mr. Lamm is one of the student leaders of MCW’s MedMoth, a live storytelling event inspired by The Moth and Milwaukee’s Ex Fabula. He reviews the most recent gathering and looks toward the future … 




One year ago, I had no idea how we could make MCW’s MedMoth storytelling event virtual. While yes, storytelling can be accomplished on various platforms, I struggled to grasp how we could take an intimate night of face-to-face interaction and connection and build the same atmosphere from the comfort of one’s home. It was a task, though, that the MedMoth team was prepared to undertake to continue the program.

In the runup to the main event, we held two virtual workshops facilitated by staff at Ex Fabula, a Milwaukee-based storytelling community. Working with other participants, our storytellers developed their narratives and honed their presentation skills. 

What we witnessed on April 8, 2021 was a celebration of stories connecting faculty, residents, staff, and students alike in ways we couldn’t have even imagined. We had eight wonderful storytellers sharing accounts ranging from how they bonded with the supply robots at Children’s to responding to a horrific trauma event as an EMT. Each storyteller brought their own experience and vulnerability on journeys that were both familiar and astonishing. 

About sixty people were in attendance from all aspects of healthcare and all points of the training spectrum. It was absolutely incredible to see a virtual group so engaged in everyone’s stories and, hopefully, they left wanting more. As we believe that there is intrinsic value to these types of narrative opportunities, we gathered data from both the participants and the audience on their experiences. 

As we continue to build the MedMoth program, we hope we can inspire more storytellers and listeners as each of us have a story to tell. It’s just a matter of when will you share it.

Please feel free to follow MCW MedMoth on Instagram (@mcwmedmoth) for updates on future events. We will be back in the Fall with more workshops and storytelling events. If you have any questions or would like to join our team, please feel free to reach out to me (Scott Lamm) at slamm@mcw.edu.

MedMoth is graciously sponsored by the Kern Institute. We would like to thank the entire institute for its continued support.



Scott Lamm is a third-year medical student at MCW-Milwaukee. 



“Ah! Bach!” and other Confessions of a “Humanities in Medical Education” Cynic, Converted

From the 4/16/2021 newsletter


Director’s Corner 


“Ah! Bach!” and other Confessions of a “Humanities in Medical Education” Cynic, Converted


Adina Kalet, MD MPH


In this Director’s Corner, Dr. Kalet admits to her own early arrogance about the introduction of the humanities in medicine and challenges us to find a rich and inspiring way forward using a character and caring framework …



Did you know that M*A*S*H, the comedy-drama television series that ran on CBS from 1972 to 1983 and based on a movie of the same name, is one of the most highly rated US television shows in history? For the few who are unfamiliar, this remarkable ensemble piece told the fictional story of the 4077th Mobile Army Surgical Hospital, in Uijeongbu, South Korea, during the Korean War (1950–53). It ran for eleven seasons, spanning the final years of the Vietnam War and into the Cold War. There were 256 thirty-minute episodes. It was a literal modern War and Peace. As does most great art, M*A*S*H grappled with the most controversial political and humanistic issues of all times. The theme song, “Suicide is Painless,” is an indicator of how deeply philosophical the writing was, and how accessible the insights. In my estimation, it is the best medical drama ever written and performed. To each his/her own, right? 

For me, a child of the 1960s and 1970s, M*A*S*H was formative. I wanted to be “Hawkeye” Pierce. Even though he was a womanizing, sarcastic, sometimes cruel practical trickster, he was also an artfully skilled, lifesaving, courageous, compassionate, and empathic physician and colleague. I was drawn to his deliciously complex character - both in the theatrical and philosophical sense - and strong moral presence. In one of my most memorable episodes, Hawkeye gives seduction advice to Walter “Radar” O’Reilly, the eerily perceptive, dewy-eyed, camp administrative savant, farm boy from Ottumwa, Iowa. Hawkeye coaches him on how to fake his knowledge of classical music to win the affections of a nurse (nurses were all women) in camp by saying “Ah! Bach!” with a dreamy look and expressive hand motions. The superficiality of the gesture has me on the floor laughing even now. Will they stop at nothing to get the girl into bed?

This represented how I felt, as a medical student and resident about the rather clumsy early efforts made by medical educators in the 1980s to seduce medical students into self-awareness through incorporating the “arts and humanities” into medicine. 


Not every humanities experience is meaningful for medical students 

Curricula which required engagement with selected works of art to view or read without much guidance or structure, felt like a manipulative and superficial ploy to get me to feel something I did not (or would not) and do something I could not yet do. I am not proud of this; I know now I was wrong. I was young and insecure. But it is still a common point of view of trainees. 

As Art Derse shares in his history of the humanities in medicine at MCW I, too, have occasionally heard students say, “I didn’t come to medical school to read poetry (insert: write stories, look at art, or watch movies).”  I think that these students are right and, yet, deeply wrong. 

They are right because medical training is hard enough and – given the great variation in how each of us prefers to access our own humanity, empathy and compassion – being required to engage with a particular work of art is too vague. Students who hold this view are deeply wrong because they misunderstand the point of the exercise. 

I personally have great difficulty connecting with poetry. For me, it is hard work and, therefore, not entertaining enough. But, of course, I now know I must do the hard work to reap the most profound lessons the humanities have to offer. And it is almost impossible to do this work on our own. We need facilitators and guides. The work of art is just the “trigger” for reflection, a starting point to get oneself to challenge assumptions, see the wart’s, face the fears. This is both hard work and not guaranteed to lead to the intended learning. 


If you haven’t read Thomas Mann’s Magic Mountain you should not be allowed to be a physician!” 

I heard this repeatedly from one of the most erudite and revered clinicians in my department in New York City in the 1990s. What he meant to communicate was that physicians should read great literature in order to develop empathy for and access to the deepest, most complex and conflictual aspects of the “illness experience.” But what he said and represented, sounded crude, insensitive and, frankly, terrifying to my modern ears. Would this powerful man really limit access to the profession based on this one book? I believed he would. I tried to talk with him about it many times. He dismissed my concerns and was openly derisive when I insisted that we focus on skills building and personal reflection as a path to ensuring all physicians have the communication skills – including empathy – to elicit the patient’s story and to build a therapeutic rapport. He absolutely despised any mention of Standardized Patients (SPs). He felt – without any direct experience, by the way - that using professional actors trained to portray patients, assess trainees’ communication skills, and provide them feedback was “fake” and manipulative. 

Given his great love of using the arts to instill empathy, this perplexed me. In my experience, SPs are highly disciplined artists willing to engage with our trainees to ensure that all patients have caring and competent physicians.  He also dismissed my choices of “great” literature, which ran more toward Toni Morrison, Alice Walker, Margaret Attwood, Jamaica Kincaid, Alice Munro, Marilynne Robinson, Tillie Olsen, Virginia Woolf, than toward Thomas Mann (as of a month ago, I have yet to get past page 300 of Magic Mountain. I am still struggling, though). And this was the leader of our Humanities in Medicine program. 

Initially, I rebelled. We needed more than simply a trigger for deep thought that was unguided and self-congratulatory.  Over the years, with many pedagogical advances and an openness to a broader range of humanities, my view has softened. My colleague was a man of his times; what other choice did he have? But we must make other choices, expand the canon, and make use of the humanities to open our minds and hearts. Not easy.   


So, where do we begin?

This past Sunday morning, my husband left the New York Times on the table opened to the Op Ed entitled “A Once-in-a-Century Crisis Can Help Educate Doctors.” I “girded my loins,” ready for a diatribe, another “humanist” telling us in medical education what we must add to an already overwhelming experience of medical training. 

But I was relieved. In this piece, Molly Worthen, a historian at UNC-Chapel Hill who writes about higher education, points out that the pandemic has given us an opportunity to transform medical education because it has forced health professionals and medical schools to look beyond the particulars of modern medicine and think more broadly about how we prepare doctors. She says, and I agree, that COVID has provided us “a pilot project to demonstrate that the humanities are an essential part of what a medical education should be — not just a luxury, but foundational.” 

She celebrates the strides we have made away from the early “humanities in medicine” days of museum visits and the “great novels,” as we move toward a true integration of the humanities at many medical centers and in many programs. The humanities force practitioners to be clear eyed even as they evaluate seemingly empirical data. “Humanists take evidence so seriously that they emphasize viewing it from multiple vantage points and recognizing one’s own limited perspective.”  

Worthen finishes, reminding us all of where we began our medical journeys days, years, or even decades ago. She says our students “grasp intuitively that medicine is not a science but an art that uses science as one of many tools.” 


Embracing Ambiguity

There is so much work to do. In this and in the last issue of the Transformational Times, we have highlighted the many ways these efforts are happening at MCW and beyond. Despite this, there is no clear path to integrate the humanities into medicine. Yet, maybe not knowing exactly how, yet embracing, the ambiguity of that task will bring us closer. Maybe that is the point. Ah! Bach!

In his own way, even Hawkeye knew that the humanities were important while working in the M*A*S*H unit. He once told an interviewer that he brought every single book ever written in English with him when he was sent to Korea. How? Well, he responded, “I brought the dictionary. I figure it's got all the other books in it.” Not a very high brow answer for a man named after Benjamin Franklin and nicknamed after a character from James Fenimore Cooper’s The Last of the Mohicans. I can’t say I agree with everything Hawkeye said, but this, at least, was right on target.  



Adina Kalet, MD MPH is the Director of the Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Institute for the Transformation of Medical Education and holder of the Stephen and Shelagh Roell Endowed Chair at the Medical College of Wisconsin.

The MCW Medical Humanities Program and Medical Education - Where We’ve Come, Where We’re Going

From the 4/16/2021 newsletter


The MCW Medical Humanities Program and Medical Education - Where We’ve Come, Where We’re Going


Arthur R. Derse, MD, JD FACEP - Director of the MCW Medical Humanities Program.


Dr. Derse describes the development of medical humanities in medical education at MCW, including the MCW Medical Humanities Program...




Recently, the London newspaper, the Daily Telegraph, announced breaking news that according to research published by the Royal Society of Medicine, “Shakespeare should be included in training for medical students so they can improve their empathy towards patients.” The medical journal article showed how by studying William Shakespeare’s insights into humanity, physicians could learn to empathize better with patients.  


This should come as no surprise to physicians who have read or revisited any of Shakespeare’s works – or to anyone familiar with the growing body of evidentiary support for the benefit to physicians and medical students of utilizing various forms of medical humanities.



The Journey to Medical Humanities in the MCW Curriculum


As an English major, I knew literature and poetry could open vistas of insight, and knew that physician-essayists such as Lewis Thomas, physician-storytellers such as Richard Selzer, and physician-poets such as William Carlos Williams, had important experiences of their lives as physicians and scientists to share. Robert Coles, MD, had written about using stories in teaching, engaging what he termed, “the moral imagination.” But 25 years ago, though every medical school had some instruction in medical ethics, medical humanities programs were rare, and the body of evidence for its use in medical education was more aspirational than established. 


In 1996 I added poetry and nonfiction essays to the M2 Medical Ethics and Palliative Care course that I directed (over the misgivings of my co-director who understandably had doubts about their usefulness in medical education). The student feedback about the benefit in helping them better understand medical ethical issues was positive for a supermajority, with the remaining either bemused or negative. One student wrote, “I didn’t go to medical school to read poetry.” Point taken. Nonfiction and fiction narratives are more straightforward instructional techniques, though poetry such as Raymond Carver’s “What the Doctor Said” has its place in medical education. 


I presented the results at a national bioethics and medical humanities conference, and received encouragement from fellow medical ethics and humanities teachers, so with this arguably auspicious start, I was on my way.


Fortunately, due to a confluence of factors, the time was right at MCW to solidify efforts to introduce and expand medical humanities. The Department of General Internal Medicine had a monthly newsletter, Grapevine, with contributions of essays from faculty and residents, edited by Jack Kaufman, MD, that ran from 1989-2001. Several faculty had strong interests in the humanities and had begun various initiatives including Herbert Swick, MD, who worked with students to publish the first issue of Auscult, the annual literary publication, and Richard Holloway, PhD, who became its publisher and was instrumental in the launch of the white coat ceremony and MCW’s Gold Foundation humanism awards. Ruric (Andy) Anderson, MD, and David Schiedermayer, MD, started an M4 elective in medical humanities in which I taught. Julia Uihlein, MA, who taught bioethics, was impressed by the medical humanities program established at Northwestern. When Dr. Anderson moved from MCW, he asked me to assume leadership of the M4 elective, which I did with Ms. Uihlein’s help. She and I received a grant to launch a formal program in medical humanities. We met with directors of 4 leading medical humanities programs to learn about them: Rita Charon, MD, PhD, at Columbia, Kathryn Montgomery, PhD, at Northwestern; Audrey Shafer, MD, at Stanford, and Ann Hudson Jones, PhD, at the University of Texas Medical Branch.



A Formal MCW Medical Humanities Program is Launched with Cornerstone Curricula 

In 2006, Julia Uihlein and I launched the MCW Medical Humanities Program, dedicated to the goals of professionalism, communication, empathy and reflection, with the support of MCW leaders President T. Michael Bolger, JD and Dean Michael J. Dunn, MD. The program sponsors, supports, and affiliates with curricular and extra-curricular initiatives at MCW.  The cornerstones of the program are the founding medical humanities courses in the MCW curriculum. 


The M4 Art of Medicine through the Humanities course, now in its 22nd year, features seminars by faculty on aspects of medical humanities including essays and stories (both non-fiction and fiction), medical history (and the history of MCW), sociology, anthropology, and other subjects related to medical practice and personal health, including advocacy, careful observation and mindfulness. Students examine creative works such as artwork, films and plays, and engage in creative processes in music, painting, improvisation, and photography. Artistic experiences in the course include trips to the Milwaukee Art Museum, the Milwaukee Symphony Orchestra, the Milwaukee Repertory Theater, and the Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design. The students also create individual final products for presentation and publication with guidance from Chris McLaughlin, an editor and writer with experience in medical journal publication.


The course has 44 faculty seminar presenters from MCW, Milwaukee and beyond – the stars in our MCW Medical Humanities constellation. Dr. Anderson, Dr. Schiedermayer, and former medical students, Dr. Brittany Bettendorf and Dr. Elizabeth Fleming return from out of town each year to teach in the course, and Dr. Holloway returns to teach remotely.


Ms. Uihlein and I were trained in 2007 to become directors for the M1 Healer’s Art course that we introduced to MCW, now offered in all 3 of our campuses as well as in the majority of medical schools. Founded by Rachel Remen, MD, at UCSF, the elective course advances wholeness, compassionate listening, self-care and service. Julie Owen, MD, MBA underwent training and has recently assumed the associate course director role on the Milwaukee campus. Erin Green, MD, leads the Green Bay course, and Linda Bluestein, MD, leads the Central Wisconsin course.


Our MCW Medical Humanities Program also established an annual medical humanities lectureship. When physician-writer Abraham Verghese, MD, inaugurated the MCW Medical Humanities program in 2006, he told our audience that the doctor-patient relationship should be at the center of the goals for medical humanities.  Academic analyses were fine, but ultimately what mattered was caring well for patients.  Since his inaugural address, many prominent figures in medical humanities have given us insights and encouragement in our journey, including physician-writer Danielle Ofri, former U.S. poet laureate, Ted Kooser, Anne Fadiman, author of The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down, Arthur Kleinman, MD, director of Harvard’s medical humanities program, physician-poet Rafael Campo, MD and Richard Kogan, MD, psychiatrist and Julliard-trained pianist.

Arthur Kleinman gave us valuable advice. He told us that it is very easy to begin medical humanities initiatives with enthusiasm, but the hard part was keeping them going year after year. We are fortunate that our 2 cornerstone humanities electives have withstood that test now for decades. 



Initiatives and Partners in the MCW Curriculum 


We worked with Bruce Campbell, MD, who had already been writing essays for publication, to offer curricular opportunities in reflective writing and creating residency application statements, as well as in creating the M4 Narrative Medicine and Reflective Writing elective. Dr. Campbell, who completed his certificate in narrative medicine and has been part of our initiatives from early days, and has created and led new ones, became associate director of the MCW Medical Humanities Program after Julia Uihlein retired in 2019. We worked with Carlyle Chan, MD, to offer MCW Muses, a daylong celebration of the arts and humanities that ran for over a decade and expanded a lectureship for bioethics that his family donated to our Center to include medical humanities.  We also offered additional lectures in medical humanities, supported by a gift from the Class of 1956.


The medical humanities have been integrated into our MCW Scholarly Pathway in Bioethics and Medical Humanities for M1s, M2s and M3s that Cynthiane Morgenweck, MD, MA and I direct. Our pathway reflects a national trend of medical school scholarly pathways that combine medical ethics with medical humanities, as has been done at Stanford, Brown, and Johns Hopkins. As an example, students from our pathway spearheaded the recent revision of MCW’s Oath recited at medical school graduation and wrote an academic article about the rationale and process. 

With course directors, I worked to incorporate medical humanities topics and techniques into the Medical Ethics, Law and Medical Humanities Curricular Thread in the MCW Discovery Curriculum, including M1 Clinical Human Anatomy, M1 & M2 Bench to Bedside, M2 Foundational Capstone, M3 Continual Professional Development, and M4 Capstone courses. K. Jane Lee, MD, MA and Ellen Blank, MD, MA worked with others to introduce a technique called the Reader’s Theater to educate students about pediatric ethics issues. 


Mary Ann Gilligan, MD, MPH and I, with grant support from the Macy Foundation and the Gold Foundation instituted a national multi-institutional curriculum for faculty to advance their teaching of humanistic behaviors to our trainee and students, including caring and communication. 


Theresa Maatman, MD, instituted a graphic medicine (i.e., medical cartooning) course as an M4 elective. Teresa Patitucci, PhD, and Jeff Fritz, PhD, instituted written reflections as part of the M1 Clinical Human Anatomy course.  Recently added modules in MCW’s curriculum include 2 programs that I had the privilege of mentoring through the Kern Transformational Ideas Initiative (TI2): Visual Thinking Strategies led by Valerie Carlberg, MD, Stephen Humphrey, MD, and Alexandria Bear, MD, and Medical Improv, led by Erica Chou, MD, and Sara Lauck, MD. These initiatives from emerging educational leaders are indeed transforming our curriculum through the use of medical humanities. 



Other MCW Medical Humanities Program Resources


The Medical Humanities Program is also the home of MCW’s Chapter of the Gold Humanism Honors Society, and we partner with MCW President and CEO John R. Raymond, Sr., MD, to select and award the annual President’s Prize in Creative Medical Writing, and partner with the library on the selection of books and journals for MCW’s Julia A. Uihlein Bioethics and Medical Humanities Library. 



Extracurricular Opportunities


At this time, a student entering the Medical College of Wisconsin has many required sessions and an array of elective opportunities in medical humanities.  These are supplemented by an even wider choice of extracurricular offerings in medical humanities, such as the Moving Pens (our MCW writers group for students, trainees and faculty), the Physicians for the Arts, the Medical Humanities Student Interest Group, the MCW Common Read, MedMoth, the MCW Art Club, the MCW Orchestra, Chordae Harmonae, Kaleidoscope, and the newest addition, the Virtual Medical Humanities Journal Club. 



Transformation and the Path Ahead


With the Kern Institute’s focus on competence, caring and character, a new exploration of medical humanities can be used to help to advance these goals. For instance, Visual Thinking Strategies can enhance competence in diagnostic skills. Medical humanities approaches help advance empathy and compassion, essential for the humanistic caring of patients that Abraham Verghese proclaimed (as did Francis Peabody, MD, a century ago). 


Virtue-based character strengths, such as creativity, curiosity, perspective, perseverance, equanimity and practical wisdom, so necessary to our professional identity formation, may be advanced through medical humanities.


The Kern Institute’s Philosophies of Medical Education Transformation Laboratory (P-METaL), led by Fabrice Jotterand, PhD, MA will be examining ways that techniques such as narrative and attention to the philosophical foundations of the practice of medicine can advance vital character strengths based in virtues.

As MCW engages in transformation of its medical school curriculum, opportunities will arise to incorporate medical humanities in the fabric of the cases and integrated illness scripts that may be the core of the new curriculum. 


The AAMC and others have recognized that medical schools need more incorporation of the medical humanities to educate physicians who will be empathetic and compassionate in their care of patients, who communicate well with them, and who understand their professional obligations.


MCW has joined the more than fifty medical schools with a formal program in medical humanities. Whether writing reflections on essays about patient encounters, carefully observing art to build observation skills, or reading Shakespeare to deepen empathy and compassion, medical humanities has been an essential part of medical education at MCW for over a quarter of a century. The MCW Medical Humanities Program will continue to sponsor, work with, and support those who integrate medical humanities in the curriculum for year to come.



Arthur R. Derse, MD, JD FACEP is Julia and David Uihlein Chair in Medical Humanities, Professor of Bioethics and Emergency Medicine, and Director of the Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities and Founding Director of the MCW Medical Humanities Program. He is faculty in the Kern Institute for the Transformation of Medical Education.