Friday, March 5, 2021

"At the Most Important Crossroads in our Life there are No Signs"

 From the 3/5/2021 newsletter


Perspective/Opinion


"At the Most Important Crossroads in our Life there are No Signs"

 

by Linda Menck, MA

 

Linda Menck, a faculty member in the Kern Institute’s KINETIC3 program, talks about how she employed the entrepreneurial mindset to recast a communications course at Marquette from a tired offering to a creativity powerhouse…

 


After seventeen years of teaching at Marquette University I found myself at the crossroads. My teaching career felt like the plot of the film Groundhog Day. 

 

As a professional faculty member in the Diederich College of Communication, I was assigned to teach the same classes every semester. It was like eating the same breakfast cereal every morning. While students in my classrooms changed, course content remained the same. 

A course I regularly taught was Introduction to Visual Communication (COMM 2100). This was a required course for all majors in the College of Communication but was demoted to an elective after a college core curriculum review. 

I remember thinking this course was destined to die, and the cause of death would be low enrollment. Students with majors in engineering, the sciences, and business administration had no desire or need to learn theories of visual communication or memorize dates and definitions of major art movements. 

This became a personal and professional prefect storm that ultimately motivated me to disrupt and transform my teaching. Consistent with my character, I didn’t ask for permission, but I knew it was time to redesign COMM 2100, and the redesign would need to be of epic proportion. At the foundation of the redesign would be personal passions, what I knew best, and essential skills research indicated our students needed to practice and become capable of applying.

I gathered my markers and faced the whiteboard to mind map my new course. “Mind mapping” is a visualization method I use and teach to promote and practice divergent and disruptive thinking. The central topic of my mind map was COMM 2100 REDESIGN and the initial major branches or connections were creativity, communication, and innovation. 

From the initial branches, twigs began to grow fast and furious. They included entrepreneurial mindset, defining and exploring creativity, building creative confidence, methods for creative problem solving, human-centered design research methods, inclusive and design thinking, disruptive innovation, and the power of storytelling and visualization to present innovative ideas and solutions. 

There were other crucial components to ensure the course would work. It had to be hands-on and grounded in active learning. This meant identifying an environment designed to untether learners from desks. The course needed to be experiential and focused on challenges in our community and the world. Finally, the content had to be collaborative in nature and applicable to students from diverse majors with a variety of skillsets. While planning it became evident this was a red-hot challenge with a whole mess of opportunity. Flying under the administrative radar screen, I created  content, rewrote the course description, objectives, and learning outcomes, and then settled on a new name for the course. Finally, it was time for the reveal. In the Fall of 2014 my new Creativity, Communication, and Innovation course was ready to be put to the ultimate test and judged by the harshest critics, our students. This was my field of dreams. I built it, but would they come? 

Course registration for the semester began and I waited and watched. The result was shock and awe. Within the first two days of registration both sections of the course filled to capacity.

The course continues to thrive and grow. Over time, it has evolved into a course that fulfills a requirement in our University’s new core of common studies, continues to push students out of their comfort zones, and builds their creative confidence. 

When I arrived at the crossroads, I chose to take the transformative route but I never traveled alone. My journey took me across campus to the Opus College of Engineering and the Kern Engineering Entrepreneurial Network (KEEN). I was welcomed, supported, and taught how to integrate entrepreneurial minded learning into my courses with a framework grounded in curiosity, connections, and creating value. 

Continuing on the road led me to MCW and the KINECTIC3 Teaching Academy. You, too, welcomed me. Collaborating with members of the KINETIC3 Advisory Committee to design and teach bootcamp workshops is an exciting new challenge. Your ongoing support transforms me with character, caring, and competence and keeps me from returning to the crossroads. 


The title of this piece is from a quote attributed to Ernest Hemingway. 


Linda E. Menck, MA, is a Professional in Residence in Strategic Communication in the Diederich College of Communication at Marquette University. She is a member of the KINETIC3 faculty. 


Teaching About Implicit Bias in the Classroom

 From the 3/5/2021 newsletter

Perspective/Opinion

Teaching About Implicit Bias in the Classroom

 

by Sandra Pfister, PhD, and Kerrie Quirk, MEd

 

Dr. Pfister and Ms. Quirk describe the course they co-lead in the KINETIC3 program which helps faculty recognize and mitigate their implicit bias when teaching...

 


The definition of implicit bias is: “the attitudes or stereotypes that affect our understanding, actions, and decisions in an unconscious manner.” Let's use a True/False question to see what you think: True or False? I have no implicit bias.  Correct answer: FALSE. Every one of us has implicit bias because that's a function of how our brains work. What happens when implicit bias takes over when we are teaching? Maybe you say that women don't have heart disease. Not said with intention, but isn't heart disease a man's disease? Or when teaching about skin disease, maybe you only show images from white patients. Not done with intention, but maybe because those were the same images used when you were a student.

Using a combination of didactics and active learning, our KINETIC3 course is structured to allow participants to explore their own implicit bias. Prework is to take the Implicit Association Test (IAT). IAT begins to connect learners with attitudes and beliefs they may not know they have (unconscious or implicit bias). The IAT website gives this example: "You may believe that women and men should be equally associated with science, but your automatic associations could show that you (like many others) associate men with science more than you associate women with science." Each KINETIC3 learner is given the opportunity to discuss their own experience with the IAT. 

This course also offers a more in-depth discussion on the meaning of implicit bias, and we delve into the role of the brain. Think FAST. Think SLOW. Think FAST involves those parts of our brain outside of conscious awareness. For example, let's say you stop your car at a red light. When the light turns green, you know to go. This mental association requires no conscious or effortful thought. In contrast, Think SLOW is the brain's conscious processing. It's what we use for mental tasks that require concentration, such as a taking an exam. Together, Think FAST and Think SLOW parts of the brain help us make sense of the world. But it is also the Think FAST parts of our brain that contribute to unconscious bias. This session looks at times when unconscious bias is activated in our brains and shows up in our teaching (when we are rushed, when we are fatigued, or when we are unprepared) and offers strategies to help. We also show a video clip from a PBS special to highlight how medical education has contributed to systemic racism and the role of institutions in contributing to implicit bias. Through small group break-out rooms, learners are given the chance to reflect on their own role as medical educators to ensure a diverse and inclusive representation in clinical case-based material.

This KINETIC3 course aligns with a Kern Institute Transformational Ideas Initiative (TI2) project led by Kerrie Quirk to design a reflection check list for faculty to assess the clinical cases currently being used in the preclinical curriculum. The project is called Identifying Bias in Classroom Clinical Cases: A Structured Approach to Make Clinical Cases More Diverse and Inclusive. Since no KINETIC3 course is complete without a chance to spin the Character Wheel, we end the session with discussion on how specific character traits can play a role in mitigating our own implicit bias. 


Sandra Pfister, PhD, is a Professor in the Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology at MCW. She is a member of the Faculty Pillar of the Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Institute for the Transformation of Medical Education. 

Kerrie Quirk, MEd, is a Program Manager in MCW’s Office of Educational Improvement.


Love to teach and recognize that learning is what really matters!

 From the 3/5/2021 newsletter


Director’s Corner

 

 

Love to teach and recognize that learning is what really matters!

 

By Adina Kalet, MD MPH

 

 

In this issue of the Transformational Times, we celebrate the Kern Institute’s KINETIC 3 Faculty Development program. Dr. Kalet thinks about how engaging with a faculty development “Community of Practice” transformed her from just another good teacher into an educator ...

 


 

I have always loved to teach. Ask my little brother about the forced spelling lessons when he was a toddler. In high school and college, I taught dance to peers and little kids at a day camp. But it was not until I became a clinical teacher that I realized that it was not enough to just love to teach. If we want to educate masterful physicians, we needed to focus on learning.

  

One night as an Intern …

 It was the dead of winter. Mr. M was admitted to my care for hypothermia and impending delirium tremens, a life-threatening consequence of alcohol withdrawal.  Joe, “my” medical student, followed me to the ER. As expected, Mr. M smelled rank and was talking gibberish (confabulating), his eyes were bright yellow where the “whites” should have been (icterus). Vitamins had been given to stave off a full-blown encephalopathy, and the first of many milligrams of Librium were already flowing into his veins along with warmed fluids. Blood was drawn and sent to the lab. The ER nurse had donned protective gear ready, on my say so, to give Mr. M a warm water bath that would not only warm him up but also wash away the dirt caked most prominently on his feet and to treat the overwhelming case of pediculosis capitis (“head lice”). As I engaged with his incoherence and gently examined Mr. M, I sensed Joe drift as far away from the bedside as he could possibly get. I was miffed that he did not show greater interest.

 Later in the evening, after ensuring that the now fresh-smelling, no longer tremulous, Mr. M had a close-to-normal body temperature, Joe and I sat side-by-side in the Doctors Station. I wrote the admission note and orders, reviewed Mr. M’s extensive medical chart, and pondered the deranged blood chemistries, his chest X-ray and the ECG. Typically, medical students overflow with questions; Joe, oddly, showed little interest and sat quietly while I worked.

 Irritated with his passivity yet wanting to wake his curiosity to the wonders of medicine, I decided to do some “teaching.” I walked to the green board, took up the chalk, and began a wide-ranging lecture. I discussed alcohol as a direct and indirect toxin, with acute and chronic manifestations in every organ in the body. I “pimped” Joe on the physical exam findings and labs which he dutifully reported. I pressed him to discuss why Mr. M was irritable but still charming even while his words did not make much sense. I pushed on. Why does he have yellow skin, tremors, an enlarged heart, a huge belly, but skinny limbs? Why does he have few red blood cells in a wide range of sizes, altered liver function in that particular pattern, and the irregularly irregular cardiac arrythmia? And finally, Why does he have this the remarkable number of ER visits, abominable hygiene and nutrition, no home, no money, no family? 

 After reveling in a medical textbook’s worth of physiology, toxicology, neurology, psychology, pathology, and dermatology – all knowledge relevant to Mr. M’s care - I plopped down in the chair. Joe was clearly impressed. I was jazzed, astonishing even myself with how much I could recite with great enthusiasm and passion.

 It was a fun, self-satisfying performance but, I know now, that did not make it a great education.

 

Why not? First of all, I never stopped to assess what Joe already knew, what he felt, or what he made of the whole experience. I did not discern if he would walk away from my lecture being any more able to care for patients like Mr. M who disgusted or frightened him. Did he now understand how to approach difficult patients emotionally and intelligently? Would he deal with them employing care, competence, and compassion? I had no idea.

 In addition, I neither tried to understand why Joe was so passive about learning, nor did I have a clue how to help him become a more the engaged and motivated learner.

 The next day, it dawned on me that Joe likely had a powerful emotional reaction to Mr. M. Did he recognize a loved one or himself in the end stage alcoholism? I did not know. Did he question his ability help in the face of such suffering? I never asked. If true, then he could have left that evening emotionally overwhelmed, questioning his career choice. 

 As a result, it is possible that my “performance” lecture had the opposite of my intended effect; rather than filling him with knowledge, I might have left him intimidated and less confident. Although Joe might have given me a glowing evaluation based on the attention I gave him (not a bad thing), I realized that, in the long run, I might have failed him.

 

 The road to becoming an educator

 After that evening, I became much more interested in becoming a better educator. Being an educator would require me to both know a great deal, but also know how to share that knowledge effectively. Although I still cared about what I taught the students, I wanted to be able to ensure they would and could learn.

 It was then that one of my mentors sponsored me to attend a weeklong faculty development program for medical educators. We worked in small groups co-creating active learning tasks (e.g., role plays, bedside rounds, reflection writing, and dialogue) and engaging in facilitated “personal awareness” groups.  I shared the story of my experience with Joe, and we role played alternative versions of that “lecture.” This was a profound experience which prepared me to return to residency as a much more effective educator.

 Ultimately, I joined the Facilitators-in-Training (FIT) program of the Academy of Communication in Healthcare (ACH). A senior member of the ACH faculty served as my “Guide.”  In monthly meetings, she coached me to identify my own learning goals and strategies. Together, we facilitated small group learning at national faculty development courses where I honed my skills with her feedback. We worked together for almost seven years, at which point I went on to serve as a guide to others.

 For over thirty years, ACH had created a community of medical educators who share a passion for communication skills training in medical education. ACH members have created innovative curriculum at many institutions and healthcare systems, conducted key scholarship, published a newsletter, a journal, and textbooks, and continued to conduct faculty development.

  

The value of Communities of Practice (CoP) in medical education; Creating concentric circles

 Most faculty development activities in medical schools consist of lectures or one-off workshops. This strategy simply does not work. Instead, experts suggest that it is best to build a community of practice (CoP) situated in an authentic workplace (See “For Further Reading” at the end of this article or click on the article links: O’Sullivan and de Carvalho-Filho.) A CoP is a group of people who "share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly.”

 CoPs are based on learning theories first proposed by cognitive anthropologist Jean Lave and educational theorist Etienne Wenger who were studying what makes apprenticeships powerful learning experiences. At their best, apprenticeships are complex sets of social relationships in the context of a community which creates a living, dynamic curriculum. CoPs are organized in concentric circles with those most intensely involved and experts at its center. Novices initially participate in the periphery, sometimes simply “lurking,” while listening in without engaging. Facilitators actively communicate with and invite in those peripheral participants. Learning happens at all levels of the organization through structured coaching relationships among individuals. Learning is, however, most intense as individuals engage more and move toward the center of the CoP.  This is one of my favorite learning theories, because it provides evidence to guide the growth of our faculty development practice in the Kern Institute.

  

KINETIC3 and the road to developing MCW’s CoPs

The essays in this issue demonstrate the many ways in which the KINETIC 3 program has established and is enriching a Faculty Development CoP at MCW.  By attracting committed, passionate medical educators to engage together in shared learning and practice, we are building capacity to enhance the learning environment for all our students. We continue learning as we tie ourselves together in learning relationships around our shared work.

 While there are basic “teaching skills” components to the KINETIC3 offerings, the members of the Kern Faculty Pillar, under the Direction of Dr. Alexandra Harrington, are building the skills of faculty that improve teaching performance and develop impactful, life changing educators. KINETIC3 graduates are already sharing their skills with colleagues, creating eddies that will become the concentric circles of our own Communities of Practice.

At the Kern Institute, we hope every faculty member will consider applying for the KINETIC3 program during their career. As faculty, we all hope to be the best educators we can be as we share our knowledge and passions. Only then will we engage, prepare, and support every student, even the ones like Joe, who passes through our doors.

 

 

For Further Reading:

O'Sullivan, Patricia S. EdD; Irby, David M. PhD Reframing Research on Faculty Development, Academic Medicine: April 2011 - Volume 86 - Issue 4 - p 421-428 doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820dc058


de Carvalho-Filho, M. A., Tio, R. A., & Steinert, Y. (2020). Twelve tips for implementing a community of practice for faculty development. Medical Teacher42(2), 143-149.

 

 

Adina Kalet, MD MPH is the Director of the Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Institute for the Transformation of Medical Education and holder of the Stephen and Shelagh Roell Endowed Chair at the Medical College of Wisconsin.

Setting the Stage to Advance Teaching in Medical Education: Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge

 From the 3/5/2021 newsletter


Perspective/Opinion


Setting the Stage to Advance Teaching in Medical Education: Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge

 

by Kristina Kaljo, PhD, and Erica Chou, MD, Medical College of Wisconsin, and Jennifer Brownson, PhD, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

 


Drs. Kaljo, Chou and Brownson share how their KINETIC3 workshop, "The Art of Teaching" is grounded in the principles of improvisation and theater - effective skillsets to incorporate when presenting complex content in medical school...

 

Preparing and advancing medical educators is a multifaceted process that requires a deep understanding of complex content, instructional methods, and diverse learner needs. Historically, medical educators do not receive formal teacher training, yet it is well documented that quality of instruction has significant impact on knowledge acquisition (Shulman, 1986). By bridging together an educator’s rich subject-matter knowledge with effective pedagogical skills, learners have the opportunity to experience transformational teaching. Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) is the unique knowledge and skillset that educators have to effectively teach content using various tools and methods to engage learners (Lamb & Firestone, 2018). To foster this skill of engagement, we developed and facilitated a KINETIC3 workshop grounded in the principles of improvisation (Fu, 2019) and theater (Singh, 2004).

A unique, interprofessional team was established including Dr. Jennifer Brownson from University of Milwaukee’s School of Education, Dr. Chou and Dr. Kaljo. Of course, due to the impact of COVID-19, this two-hour ‘Art of  Teaching’ workshop was facilitated synchronously via Zoom. Theater, the stage and performance served as a literal backdrop. Participants progressed through three ‘acts’: creating your lesson, delivering your lesson, and adapting to the audience. Supported by the experiential learning framework (Kolb, 2014), participants explored and applied strategies within their own teaching. This included improvisation activities such as Mirrors and Half-Life, to encourage attunement and to practice editing teaching content. Sociodrama methods were also integrated to explore various learner perspectives and attitudes, and ways to adapt teaching.

The workshop was offered twice in the fall of 2020 with 38 participants: faculty across ranks, experience levels and specialties, nurses, trainees including: residents, fellows, and postdocs, and other academic teaching staff. By ‘setting the stage’ and modeling effective presentation strategies for medical educators, this workshop provided experiences and concrete opportunities to explore their teaching practice. Even in the virtual environment, engagement was apparent in the ways in which participants asked questions, reflected in the Zoom chatbox, and analyzed case scenarios. 

Theater and medical improvisation are unconventional but important pedagogical skills to incorporate within one’s teaching practice. Bridging these skills with existing subject-matter expertise, participants establish a foundation of pedagogical content knowledge to effectively present complex content. 

KINETIC3 is a supportive environment for medical educators to explore and apply educational theory and a pedagogical practice to encourage professional risk taking. We encourage you to apply for the upcoming KINETIC3 program!


Kristina Kaljo, PhD, is an Assistant Professor and Clerkship Co-Director in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology at MCW, specializing in curriculum and instruction, educational research and community-engaged research. She is a member of the Faculty Pillar of the Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Institute for the Transformation of Medical Education.

Erica Chou, MD, is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Pediatrics at MCW. She leads the Interprofessional Education (IPE) thread in the undergraduate medical education curriculum, and is a member of the Curriculum Pillar of the Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Institute for the Transformation of Medical Education. 

Jennifer Brownson, PhD, is a lecturer in the School of Education at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. 

 

Creating Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Acute Care Pediatric Nurse Practitioner Students

 From the 3/5/2021 newsletter

Perspective/Opinion

Creating Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Acute Care Pediatric Nurse Practitioner Students


Jill C. Kuester, MSN, RN, CPNP-AC, Katie McDermott, MSN, RN, CPNP-AC, Jennifer K. Pfister, MSN, RN, CPNP-AC, C-NPT, Christine Schindler, PhD, CPNP, and Leslie Talbert, DNP, RN, CPNP-AC/PC

 

EPAs are widely used in measuring the progress of residents in graduate medical education. The members of the Marquette team describe their KINETIC3 capstone in which they adopted an EPA approach to graduate nursing education…



Nursing and medicine go together like peanut butter and jelly. Although distinct, we complement one another. As interdisciplinary teams improve at working together, we have found the ability to gain insights from the more traditional pathways of each other’s endeavors.

The Kern Institute holds a yearlong program known as the KINETIC3 Teaching Academy where the goal is to improve medical education. Character, caring, and competence in medical education are at the center of the program with each participant or group focused on completing a project incorporating these traits.

The five core faculty members from Marquette University’s Acute Care Pediatric Nurse Practitioner (MU ACPNP) program completed a capstone project focused on creating Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs). Guided by the Code of Ethics published by the American Nurses Association which explicitly states that nurses have compassion and respect for their patients and families, nurses already have a strong reputation for caring. We knew that the KINETIC3 program might offer a different perspective to build upon this foundation.

As nursing has been named the most trusted profession for nineteen years in a row (Gallup), we wondered how this could be operationalized into our graduate level curriculum. EPAs have been widely used in medical education but remain a novel concept in nursing education. The MU ACPNP faculty believed the act of entrustment was well suited to our nurse practitioner students. 

Utilizing this concept from medical education and knowledge gained through the KINETIC3 courses, our group conducted a systematic literature search, synthesized that literature, and created a template to guide development of the individual EPAs. Each member then focused on one of five EPA topics: 

  • Reflective practice 
  • Leadership identity 
  • Holism 
  • Social justice 
  • Magis - the concept of using talents to strive for excellence 

Each project team member was the designated lead on an individual EPA and drafted the EPA using the template. Iterative cycles of reflection, collaborative review, feedback, and revision were conducted to ensure consensus regarding content, outcomes, and assessment sources. These collaborative sessions were held synchronously, both in-person and virtually, to promote clarity in communication. The final stage of revisions included alignment of language and descriptors used across all five EPAs to promote continuity of content and universality of tone. 

Each EPA includes a succinct action-oriented title followed by a more robust description linked to key literature, as well as a justification statement calling out its significance and impact beyond the walls of Marquette. Each EPA encompassed several nurse practitioner competency domains and described the required knowledge, skills, and attitudes the students must possess for success. Some of the methods of assessment we will use include, but are not limited to, direct observation, critical review and evaluation of projects, reflective journaling, and exit interviews.

As graduate students move into professional practice, our goal is for them to embody the values we espouse as a faculty in alignment with MU’s mission, vision, and core values. EPAs hold the promise of operationalizing the transformation to a competency-based education framework for PNPs by defining a pathway with a common language and clearly articulated ideal outcomes. The KINETIC3 program afforded us the opportunity to learn and work as a team to intentionally develop key strategies to enhance the development of the competent and compassionate nurse practitioner.


Jennifer K. Pfister MSN, CPNP-AC, C-NPT, is a Pediatric Critical Care Nurse Practitioner at MCW/Children’s Wisconsin and a Transport Team Clinical Educator at Children's Wisconsin. She also has a joint appointment at Marquette University where she is part-time faculty within the Acute Care Pediatric Nurse Practitioner program. 

Christine Schindler, PhD, CPNP, is a Pediatric Nurse Practitioner and Advanced Practice Provider Director for Critical Care/Palliative Care At MCW/Children’s WI. She has a joint appointment at Marquette University where she serves as a Clinical Associate Professor and director of the Acute Care Pediatric Nurse Practitioner program. 

Leslie Talbert, DNP, is a Pediatric Nurse Practitioner at MCW/Children’s Wisconsin. 

Katie McDermott, MSN, RN, CPNP-AC, is a Pediatric Nurse Practitioner for Critical Care at MCW/Children’s Wisconsin and has a joint appointment at Marquette University where she is part-time faculty within the Acute Care Pediatric Nurse Practitioner program. She also serves as the Program Director at the Dairy Cares Simulation Lab at Children's Wisconsin. 

Jill C. Kuester, MSN, RN, CPNP-AC, is a Pediatric Critical Care Nurse Practitioner at MCW/Children’s Wisconsin. She has a joint appointment at Marquette University where she serves as Part-time Faculty in the Acute Care Pediatric Nurse Practitioner program.

 

What Learners Tell Us About How They Know When They Matter

 From the 3/5/2021 newsletter


Perspective/Opinion


What Learners Tell Us About How They Know When They Matter

 

Preliminary results of a KINETIC3 project by Caitlin Patten, MD, Rana Higgins, MD, and Karen Marcdante, MD, with data from Alexandra Lutley, MD, and Adam Szadkowski, MD

 

Drs. Patten, Higgins, and Marcdante describe how they used qualitative methodology and semi-structured interviews to understand and design future interventions to help all learners feel that they matter...

 


We have all been students at some point in our life. Do you remember a day when you were in a classroom, meeting, or a clinical learning environment when you wondered why you were there? Perhaps, no one acknowledged your presence or asked your name. Or they dismissed what you said. Or when you returned after a prolonged absence, no one realized you had been gone. These behaviors make you feel like you don’t matter. Knowing that you matter means that others’ behaviors, actions, and words make you feel valued and useful. They are aware of you, make you feel important by paying attention to/going out of their way for you, and rely on you. It turns out that mattering (the perception that you matter) is an enabling concept – when you feel you matter you have more self-esteem and self-efficacy which leads to less anxiety and depression, allowing you to learn more! Helping others matter is one way to improve the learning environment.

But, how do our learners perceive that they matter? A group of faculty participating in the 2019-2020 KINETIC3 faculty development program asked that question. While participating in this structured program, Dr. Rana Higgins and Dr. Caitlin Patten (Surgery – M3/M4 students), Dr. Adam Szadkowski (Pediatrics - fellows) and Dr. Alexandra Lutley (Neurology - residents) each used qualitative methodology and semi-structured interviews to find out what learners at various levels perceived as evidence that they matter. 

While there are some differences in specific stories among the learners based on their training levels, they all needed to know that others were aware of them. Here is some of what they said: Learners felt they mattered when residents and Faculty called them by name (yes, it is that simple!). They also feel they matter when you make eye contact and put the phone down while talking with them. Part of being aware is also finding out what makes each learner a unique individual– where they are from, their past experiences, and what their current interests and/or career goals are. Identifying learners’ interests and strengths were not only a way to be aware of them, but it also made them feel important. 

Importance was highlighted when medical students were assigned meaningful tasks - making them a valued member of the team. When students perceived their educators relied solely on them to complete an assigned task that was essential to success of the team, they had a strong sense of mattering. Additionally, learners feel important when those supervising them (residents /faculty) “went out of their way” to see how they were doing, ask about one of their projects, or perform an impromptu mini education session. 

The third component of mattering is when someone relies on you. For our learners, this varied with level of training. For medical students, mattering occurs when they are trusted to collect information that is needed and not getting duplicated by another team member. For residents and fellows, they felt that others relied on them when they provided care in an emergency or when others came to them for help or advice. 

This is the first work of its kind with learners in medical education. The faculty’s projects for KINETIC3 utilized a small group of learners to help direct future interventions to improve mattering for all learners. Their findings can help us all recognize which words, actions and behaviors make learners feel they matter, allowing them to be more curious, comfortable, and creative. It is essential to understand that mattering requires building a relationship. Educators and students alike all want to matter and will feed off each other. If a learner has a sense of mattering, they will be more engaged with learning and with their educators. In turn, educators will feel their time spent with students was worthwhile and they may be more motivated to teach. Moving forward, remember how it felt when you did not matter as a learner and how easily you can prevent others from feeling that same way through awareness, importance, and reliance. 


Caitlin Patten, MD, FACS, is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Surgery/Division of Surgical Oncology specializing in Breast Surgery. She is Associate Program Director for the Surgery Clerkship and enjoys partnering with colleagues in the Kern Institute to improve the educational experience for all learners. She is a 2019-20 graduate of the Kern KINETIC3 program. 

Rana Higgins, MD, FACS, FASMBS, is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Surgery focused on robotic hernia, foregut and bariatric surgery. She is an Associate Program Director of the General Surgery residency and a 2019-20 graduate of the Kern KINETIC3 program.

Karen Marcdante, MD, is a Professor in the Department of Pediatrics (Critical Care) at MCW. She is Director of the Human-Centered Design Laboratory, a member of the Faculty Pillar, and serves on the steering committees of the KINETIC3 Teaching Academy and Philosophies of Medical Education Transformation Laboratory in the Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Institute for the Transformation of Medical Education. 

Three Questions For Teresa Patitucci, PhD

 From the 3/5/2021 newsletter


Three Questions For Teresa Patitucci, PhD 

Assistant Professor Cell Biology, Neurobiology & Anatomy 

Medical College of Wisconsin



What was most beneficial about KINETIC3? 

The KINETIC3 Training Program was valuable for learning more about becoming an effective medical educator. This included various modalities that can be used for effective classroom sessions, like different active learning strategies, as well as how to assess learning from those sessions and provide feedback to learners. As a foundational scientist, it was hugely valuable to me to participate in these workshops with those engaged in clinical teaching to get a better understanding of where students are headed once they are finished with my courses. It was great to learn teaching tips from other participants in the courses! 


 How have you incorporated what you learned?

 I incorporate what I learned in KINETIC3 all the time! I had some teaching training experience prior to KINETIC3 where I learned nuts and bolts of writing learning outcomes and assessment questions, but really benefitted from learning more about adult learning theory, incorporating character into teaching, culturally responsive teaching, and turning education into scholarship. I regularly apply these lessons when designing courses and sessions, looking for “teachable moments” and ways to go over material that is engaging to an adult learner and trying to put the concept in context of how they will use it in the wider world with their patients. As an anatomist training learners for direct patient care, I find it important not just to talk about a structure on the body, but also how we as a culture interact with that region of the body and when a patient may need extra reassurance. 


What was your capstone and where has it gone? 

My capstone project focused on using critical reflection of strengths and weaknesses to develop character and emotional intelligence. Our project examined reflective writing pieces from M1 learners enrolled in Cliical Human Anatomy on the MCW-CW campus. We learned a lot about the student experience during their first 6 months adjusting to medical school, specifically analyzing comments in the domains of emotional intelligence, wellbeing, and teamwork. Students received feedback from a faculty member and completed self-assessments as follow-ups to the reflective writing activities. Since then, my capstone partner and I have continued working on this project, now with the help of a Transformative Initiatives (TI2) Grant from the Kern Institute. We are enrolling students from campuses other than MCW-CW, adding discussion sessions, and evaluating impact of repeated critical reflection on selfawareness and professional identity.

Thursday, March 4, 2021

Setting the Expectation for a Growth Mindset in KINETIC3’s Excellence in Teaching Track

From the 3/5/2021 newsletter 


Perspective/Opinion 


Setting the Expectation for a Growth Mindset in KINETIC3’s Excellence in Teaching Track


Alexandra Harrington, MD


Dr. Harrington shares that character development in adults seems dependent on having a growth mindset, a frame of mind adopted by the Kern Institute's KINETIC3 Teaching Academy...



As I reviewed the results of my Values in Action (VIA) character strengths survey, I noted the ‘top 5’ of honesty, judgement, love, perseverance and fairness, but was naturally drawn to those strengths ranked at the bottom, self-regulation, social intelligence, and spirituality. For those unfamiliar with this survey, it is a free survey (available at https://www.viacharacter.org/)- that all KINETIC3 learners take prior to our first course- that ranks your character strengths based on your answers to a series of questions. Can I better control my emotions and reactivity? How do I improve my interpersonal relationships? These questions and other related ones had me reflecting on my mindset. With a growth mindset, I certainly could practice better self-control, but not with a non-acknowledging, resistant fixed mindset. Character development in adults seems dependent on having this growth mindset.

 A growth mindset is defined by Dr. Carol Dweck as the belief that talents and skills can be developed in oneself and/or others. We have adopted this frame of mind in the KINETIC3 program and have set the expectation for having a growth mindset with respect to teaching in the Excellence in Teaching Track. Our learners are asked early in the program to reflect on previous teaching evaluations. We ask learners to share their positive evaluations and reflect on growth opportunities. Then, we ask learners to share any negative feedback on their teaching and again reflect on growth opportunities. We try to explore those opportunities, even if the negativity of the evaluation seems like Jimmy Kimmel’s mean tweets! KINETIC3 learners are given time to reflect substantively on their teaching and character strengths and opportunities for improvement and commit to working on those growth fronts during their coached teaching observations.

“We’re all a mixture . . . it’s true that you can have a fixed mindset in one area and a growth mindset in another and that it’s a spectrum, not a dichotomy,” Dr. Dweck tells us in a videoed interview that we watch in KINETIC3 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-71zdXCMU6A&feature=youtu.be). 

Learners are asked to reflect and share stories wherein they had a fixed mindset and then situations in which they have had growth mindsets. And as Dr. Dweck advises, we ask learners to reflect on the triggers of the fixed mindset. What puts you in the fixed mindset in that moment? The goal in this exercise is to identify the trigger in hopes of avoiding the rigidity in the future. We stretch our learners to mentor themselves hypothetically then towards a growth-minded belief if they encounter similar scenarios in the future. Lastly, we share examples of fixed and growth mindsets related to our previous educational experiences, such as disregarding student evaluative feedback (fixed) and trying a new active learning exercise (growth). It is imperative we recognize that in the teacher-student relationship, our mindset may influence our learners’ mindsets (and vice versa!).

Alexandra Harrington, MD, MT (ASCP), is a Professor of Pathology and Director of Hematopathology in the MCW Department of Pathology. She serves as Director of the Faculty Pillar and the KINETIC3 Teaching Academy within the Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Institute for the Transformation of Medical Education.

Friday, February 26, 2021

Let’s Renegotiate the “Social Contract” in a Way that Promotes Human Flourishing

From the 2/26/2021 newsletter


Director’s Corner


Let’s Renegotiate the “Social Contract” in a Way that Promotes Human Flourishing 


Adina Kalet, MD MPH



This week Dr. Kalet wonders how we might reimagine the relationships among society, the profession, and healthcare systems to ensure the ability to pursue human flourishing for us all …


Toward the end of his life, my father-in-law needed a generalist physician to provide real primary care, but he had neither an engaged, attentive physician, nor a system that was prepared to enable this type of attentive oversight. 

A couple of years before his death, a hurricane hit the region where he lived on the east coast of Florida. Unable to contact him and knowing that the area had lost electricity, my husband flew down from New York the next day. Mark found his father sitting in a dark, warm, damp apartment struggling for breath. Mark’s dad had experienced a significant myocardial infarction and was in florid heart failure. 

Over the next few months, my father-in-law’s physician-son and nurse-daughter scrambled to manage his health care needs as he deteriorated. He required prolonged hospitalizations in a cardiac rehab facility utilizing resources up to the full limit of what Medicare would allow. When he returned home, none of Dad’s specialist physicians offered to take responsibility for coordinating his care or arranging for homecare. Luckily for Dad, his son and daughter-in-law were physicians, and his daughter and son-in-law were nurses. My husband attempted to manage things from a thousand miles away by phone, fax, and email, and eventually was able to hire a wonderful aide who stopped by for a few hours each day to help with the activities of daily life and a private care coordinator. Despite the fact that he could hardly walk or drive, Dad’s local physicians insisted that he come to their offices for regular weight checks and refills. He missed many appointments, was confused about his medications, and was disgusted with the whole thing. We would have paid dearly to offer Dad the level of medical care coordination my husband is able to provide his own patients through the VA System, our largest publicly financed, national health care model.


We REALLY need more primary care physicians and compassionate teams

Last week in this space, I outlined why and how medical schools need to train more primary care physicians. Data have shown that access to good primary care in accessible, coordinated, integrated, and globally funded systems is associated with the best outcomes and lower costs; these paradigms offer benefits to communities and to patients like my father-in-law who have chronic medical conditions. Without a solid primary care physician, even patients like my father-in-law with excellent insurance and attentive social support, have less-than-ideal outcomes. 

I think we need to come together to make things better for us all. I am convinced that if my father-in-law had had a generalist physician practicing in a coordinated and supportive healthcare system, he would have received more competent, coordinated, and compassionate care.  Dad and his family would have had a better quality of life over those final couple of years, less confusion and stress, fewer days in high-cost care, and a “better death.” No doubt, there would have been significant cost savings. While many systems strive to do this and many medical schools work toward preparing students to enter competent health care systems, this is not the reality for most of the country.


Rethinking how care is provided by reviewing an imperfect model

Recently, a friend shared an email she received from the primary care physician to whom I had referred her many years ago. This well-established physician was transforming her practice from an insurance-based to a “membership” model. In exchange for an annual retainer (relatively modest compared with similar arrangements), she offered herself to be personally accessible 24/7 for telehealth visits, promised next day appointments, and provided office visits that were three times the length of what she had been able to schedule before (thirty v. eleven minutes). For patients like my father-in-law, she offered to proactively oversee home care, ensure medications are delivered and taken appropriately, and stay in touch with the patient, healthcare team members, and family. She would serve as the team’s quarterback, providing the leadership that winning teams need. 

At first, I was critical of this Executive Model - what some call “concierge” medicine - where wealthier patients with health insurance pay for the kind of consistent, high quality access I believe everyone deserves. But, as I thought about what this change in practice model said about the physician’s well-being, my heart broke. This wonderful woman had always practiced “cognitive” medicine in a fee-for-service model where the only way she could generate revenue was by seeing office patients. In her old system, her “success” was measured by seeing more-and-more patients for shorter-and-shorter visits.  By embracing the new model, she would likely enhance her income while practicing medicine the way she knew it should be done. 

Numbers matter though. One serious problem with this type of “tiered” model of care is that, unless there is a dramatic increase in the number of primary care physicians, even fewer people and communities will have access to quality primary care. This shift will have the greatest impact on those who live in poverty, are disproportionately affected by the social determinants of health, have increased rates of comorbidities, and have little or no insurance. Yet, this is exactly the population that stands to benefit most from ready access to compassionate, attentive, and highly coordinated primary care.  


The divide between cognitive and procedural physicians is making the situation worse 

Part of the problem with workforce distribution and balance is the widening income differential between cognitive and procedural physicians. Since 1980, the median salary of cognitivists has increased at the rate of inflation, while the median salary of physicians who perform procedures has doubled. This gap translates into a $3-$5 million lifetime advantage for proceduralists. This economic power allows proceduralists to benefit more readily from modern practice management (e.g., partnering with advanced practice nurses or physician assistants, medical scribes, and other documentation technology), thereby gaining efficiency, further widening the gap, and increasing their personal salaries. Meanwhile, cognitivist physicians can only increase their efficiency by giving up what is most meaningful and valuable in their work: communicating with patients in the context of strong relationships, taking time to figure out complex problems, and committing to longitudinal care. Under the current models, cognitivists cannot optimize their practices without trading off what is most satisfying in their work. 


We need to rethink the social contract between physicians and society

Many (including me) have pointed out that medical professionalism is the basis of medicine’s social contract. But as things change, we see that this simplistic view of the contract is a poor metaphor for the complex physician-patient relationship. The COVID-19 pandemic has given the medical profession a reprieve from decades of society’s eroding trust as we move from a predominately solo practice model to a more systems-based model. Physicians around the world have demonstrated that we will serve, run toward disaster, and care for the sick even when our own health is threatened. It is time that the old, implicit sets of agreements between society and the profession be aired out and reimagined. The moment to reexamine the details of the social contract is here. 

As a country, we spend enormous amounts of money for healthcare, yet the outcomes, both for physicians and society, are far from optimal. Taxpayers provide $20 Billion annually to support graduate medical education, and support all aspects of medical education through public insurance, yet the average physician and their family sacrifices for years in order to join the profession and accumulates significant debt. We need real, granular conversations about the cost of medical school (of all school), effective practice models that balance outcomes with efficiencies in care, and ways to enable physicians and patients to spend more time together, engaged in doing the meaningful work that promotes wellness. If we don’t put our heads together and find a better way to improve public health while creating a healthy, physician workforce, both society and physicians will continue to suffer.


Human Flourishing 

In a perfect medical world, healthy physicians would expect to learn and work at the highest intellectual and technical levels while they spend their careers doing both what they ought to be doing but also what they want to do for its own sake. The environment would allow them to perform their callings at the level of the “highest human good,” what Aristotle called εὐδαιμονία or Eudemonia, translated as human flourishing. Ensuring these kinds of environments should be goals for both physicians and society as we renegotiate the social contract. 

I suspect many of you have similar tales to the one I shared about my father-in-law. Many people shake their heads talking about care lapses for elderly loved ones or other family members. These all-too-common stories reflect the perverse incentives, inefficiency, waste, burnout, and lack of attention that can emerge from our current bureaucratic models of care. Sometimes, it feels as though character-driven, compassionate care is the exception, not the rule. 

At the Kern Institute, we are committed to transformation, and today’s issue explores how we hope to promote human flourishing. If things are to change for the coming generations, physicians, who - as a group - have always demonstrated the willingness to be there, must be given the moral agency to do their work in safe and well-equipped environments while pursuing professional fulfillment, well-being, joy, and collaboration with other healers. We must commit to exploring new approaches where society can expect a healthy workforce, and every family knows who to call when that time comes for a prepared, highly competent, and compassionate hand on the wheel.



Adina Kalet, MD MPH is the Director of the Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Institute for the Transformation of Medical Education and holder of the Stephen and Shelagh Roell Endowed Chair at the Medical College of Wisconsin. 

Tuesday, February 23, 2021

Coming Home

From the 2/19/2021 newsletter


Coming Home


Allison McLellan, MD



Dr. McLellan, a current Pediatrics resident at MCW, describes connecting her past and future through an instant and deep love of rural Alaska...



The fact that I was sobbing as the plane landed in Anchorage didn’t make sense. I was a fourth-year medical student about to interview for a residency spot; the crying would have made sense if it was due to nerves but that wasn’t the reason for my tears. I was treated to a monochrome view from my window- ice, sky, trees and snow, all grey. It was the most beautiful thing I had ever seen. I was struck by the feeling that I was going home again, which is odd, since I’d never been there before. 

Like most scientists, I trust the things I can see and hear; the things I can quantify and catalogue. The fact that I was trying to sob quietly into the sleeve of my hoodie so the man sitting next to me didn’t assume I was insane solely because of a “feeling” seemed odd. 

My childhood involved moving from place to place often enough that most people assume one or both of my parents are in the military. In reality, my father’s engineering degree and mining background allowed us to make the move from the northern Ontario mining town where I was born to the US. We went back to Canada constantly while I was growing up because we were the only members of our family in the US. We made trips once or twice a year to ice fish, camp, and see our relatives. 

I loved everything about it, until I didn’t. I thought things changed too quickly; people moved, houses were torn down, trees were cut and childhood memories vanished. In reality, I was the one who had changed but the end result was the same - Canada had stopped being my home.

This was fine; after all, I was now an adult. I didn’t need a home base - I inherited an adventurer’s spirit from my parents. The home I had I would make and carry with me. I had dreams and plans - go to medical school, become a doctor. I planned on being the doctor my grandfather had deserved as a child, rather than the one he had. He’d grown up in a remote area of Canada where medical care was sparse even for white children. For Native children like him, it was almost non-existent. 

I still retained a fondness for the north, much to the chagrin of my Florida medical school, who assured me it would be much easier to match to a residency in Florida. “Why even try to leave the state for residency? It is so difficult, and you could risk not matching,” they told me. I did everything they told me not to. I did multiple away rotations as far north as I could get. I applied for residency in every state that wasn’t Florida, and I applied for programs that were considered to be out of my league by my medical school. I didn’t care. I wrote my personal statement about my grandfather and my desire to care for people that needed it the most - those living in places others didn’t want to live, or those people that are often deemed “lesser than” due to the color of their skin or their genetic makeup. I wanted to be the pediatrician that my grandfather never had, and I wanted to find a town where I could do that and also find my home. I did not match into a residency program that granted me an all-access pass to Alaska, but that didn’t stop me. I had called my husband from the bathroom of Ted Stevens International Airport in Anchorage and asked if I could just not come home. 

We’d settled on a pact - I would do everything I could to get back to Alaska, and he was up for the challenge. I was absolutely relentless - I had seen the light and found my home after only spending three days there. I talked about it incessantly, researched where I could work and where my husband and I could live. I structured my whole residency around the plan that I was going to get to Alaska, come hell or high water, come earthquakes or global pandemics. 

The next time the plane landed in Anchorage, it was after midnight. No view of the water or snow or sky, just lights in the darkness. Thomas Wolfe said, “you can’t go home again,” and I honestly believed him. What if I didn’t have that feeling again? 

My husband knew that I had started crying before I did. I don’t know when it happened; probably when the plane turned in the same spot it had three years ago and I was treated to the lights reflecting off the snow of the city below me. My heart pounded, my mouth went dry, and I squeezed my husband’s hand until the plane landed. 


Allison McLellan, MD is a PGY3 resident in the Department of Pediatrics at MCW. 


Friday, February 19, 2021

Some Questions for Lisa Grill Dodson, MD - Dean, MCW-Central Wisconsin Campus

 From the 2/19/2021 newsletter


Some Questions for…

Lisa Grill Dodson, MD - Dean, MCW-Central Wisconsin Campus



Rural hospitals have long faced tight funding, declining resources, challenging recruitment/retention issues, and low volumes/reimbursements, yet they are expected to be ready to care for the full-range of health issues including opioid / methamphetamine addiction, obstetrical care, COVID-19, refractory mental health issues, farm machinery accidents, and high-speed vehicular trauma. We spoke to Lisa Dodson, MD, the Dean of the MCW-Central Wisconsin Campus in Wausau, about the challenges facing her campus and the future of rural healthcare …



Transformational Times: How does a regional campus help address some of the challenges of rural health care?  

Dr. Dodson: Regional campuses play several roles as we address the unique challenges of rural health. First and foremost, a regional campus can directly impact workforce availability. Students who grow up away from large urban areas, train in smaller cities, and are accustomed to the lifestyle are more likely to practice in less densely populated, underserved counties. These students have the extra level of resilience needed to survive and thrive and will be ready for the constant challenges in both pathology and policy that have an oversize effect on rural communities. 


TT: What can you tell us about students that are drawn to regional campuses?

Dr. Dodson: First of all, they are truly unique. Students coming from rural areas to medical school are unbelievably underrepresented. Nationally, medical schools  currently have the smallest percentage of students coming from rural backgrounds since records have been kept and most medical students in urban areas will never meet a rural mentor or have any rural experience. So, we actively look for students from rural areas, believing they have a greater likelihood of going back to the same or similar communities. 

The mentors these students meet are critical. They show the students that that they don’t have to be “saints” or “missionaries” to go into rural medicine. These are great, fun, rewarding jobs. Intrinsically motivated, curious, and pragmatic students find great challenge and reward in these settings. 

Because of their backgrounds and the backgrounds of their teachers, regional campus students might be less susceptible to the overt and subtle messages aimed at discouraging them from pursuing smaller community primary care careers. These students tell me that they are often subjected to comments asking them why they don’t want to “aim higher.” They hear that a lot but, fortunately, they also see how satisfied their mentors are. The students learn to say, “Thanks for the advice but this is what I want to do.” They learn to believe in themselves and their choices. Our goal is to support them to make the right choices for themselves. 

Think about the challenge: 

It is nearly impossible to convince a student to enter primary care in a small town if they have come to medical school from an urban/suburban background, have only seen urban medicine, and are convinced they want to be a subspecialist in a large city. The system is designed to take students who want to be family physicians and steer them toward specialties; rarely, does it work in the opposite direction. 

Recruiting students from less populated areas isn’t foolproof, of course. Some students from small towns will see medical school as their “ticket out of Dodge.” Finding students who will commit to return to a small town after having been through medical school and residency training is special. 



TT: What challenges do you see in the rural health care workforce and in rural health care in the coming decade? 

Dr. Dodson: Over the coming decade, we need to better understand and develop pipelines for all rural populations into health care professions. For example, we have an Advancing Healthier Wisconsin grant that is targeted to increasing matriculation for Hmong students. We hope to expand to other groups. One successful example in Wisconsin is the UW-Madison Native American Center for Health Professions which was founded by Dr. Erik Brodt (View the We are Healers website here). 

To attract and retain rural students into our communities, we are partnering with Aspirus, a local health system. The Aspirus Scholars program provides full-tuition scholarships to medical students in exchange for a commitment to return to work in the area for at least five years. There are fifteen current or recently graduated Aspirus Scholars at MCW-Central Wisconsin.

Political and policy changes are imperative. Policy makers must refocus on community engagement, health equity, population health for all populations throughout the state. Unfortunately, the solutions that work in urban regions don’t always work in smaller towns. Both areas need access to equitable public health. Both areas need access to quality care in trauma, medical emergencies, and obstetrics. Even though they might not be needed often and the volumes of patients are low, the systems - and society writ large - need to make certain that these services and properly trained staff are available when needed. When someone is in urgent need, you can’t always just “drive to the next town.” Keeping these services available is a larger problem than any one town or county, and the loss of small-town hospitals across the region is a concern.  

We could think of the need for healthcare in the region the way our predecessors faced the need for electricity when it first became available. In those days, rural areas developed public utilities. There was a societal decision that everyone should have access to electricity because the benefits outweighed the costs of getting wiring to remote regions - a concept with which we all agree. To reach rural areas, utilities required federal and state funding, but still maintained local control. Medicine, like electricity, could be delivered to all people in need, not to the highest bidder.  

We need to advocate for our communities. If school systems are underfunded and failing, it will be hard to recruit physicians with young families. If infrastructure is not maintained, there will not be enough people to support practices and physicians will not have enough resources to provide care.  


TT: What challenges do you see in your accelerated curriculum, and in medical school curricula, in general? 

Dr. Dodson: We do need to build different curricula. A compressed medical school curriculum like ours does not easily fit for someone who intends to enter subspecialty surgery; there just isn’t sufficient time for them to get the exposure they need to be a competitive applicant for residency. On the other hand, not every student needs the same length of time to master what they will need to succeed. We need to stop thinking of medical school duration in terms of  “integers”; curricula should be more flexible than exactly three, four, or even five years. In competency-based curricula, students finish when they have displayed mastery. I have seen students who are close, but not quite ready, after their three years. Some need a few extra months beyond three years to be prepared, but not a full year. Curriculum reform should focus on using time to optimize student preparation and not as “remediation.” 



TT: What has surprised you most in your position? 

Dr. Dodson: Being a dean is a weird job! It’s like having a baby. Nothing is every quite what you planned or thought it would be. You hit surprises. You hit roadblocks. For example, when I arrived, there were great physicians here, but we needed to launch into faculty development to turn them into teachers. It was harder than anticipated but very gratifying.

It has been rewarding to see how much our community physicians clearly enjoy the opportunity to give back to the next generation. Since the classes are small, we find the chance to work with the students to be very engaging. They challenge us. They want to know, Why do you do things that way? The students bring ideas, keep us fresh, and keep the job rewarding. 

I have been surprised by how difficult it can be to recruit physicians. Wausau isn’t that small of a town and we are close to major metropolitan regions. The area is amazing. We really need neurologists, but the system has been unable to get people to look.  It’s hard. So we’ll grow our own. 



TT: Any final words?

Dr. Dodson: I have loved seeing how in rural areas we all depend on each other in ways that aren’t always seen in larger urban areas. A small town will find out what you can do and put you to work. In my first rural practice, the hospital hired my husband (a chemical engineer) to install their first computer system. Once that project was completed, he was been hired to do regional economic development, also something out of his core area of expertise. Rural communities work together. 

I think being part of a regional campus has given me a unique perspective on the current state of medical school education. Too often, schools focus on what doctors need and want. “We want more specialty training!” At our regional campus, we also focus on what the community and society need. That is more rewarding and is, I believe, where medical education needs to turn. When we ask, “What do the neighbors need?” we think about where best to place our resources. Regional campus can demonstrate this. We listen and respond. 



Lisa Grill Dodson, MD is the Sentry Dean and Founding Dean at MCW-Central Wisconsin, a position to which she was appointed in August 2014. She completed her family medicine residency and fellowship at the Oregon Health Sciences University. 

Interview conducted by Bruce H. Campbell, MD.