Friday, June 18, 2021

Reflections on New Beginnings

From the 6/18/2021 newsletter


Perspective/Opinion 


Reflections on New Beginnings 


By Olivia Davies, MD; and Brieana Rodriquez, MD 





 Drs. Olivia Davies and Brieana Rodriquez reflect on moving cross county to begin their new journeys for residency… 


Dr. Olivia Davies: 


I have lived in Wisconsin for most of my life. I did undergrad at Madison and medical school at MCW, when I shut the door on my 20-foot U-Haul and locked it for the long drive out to Boston I couldn’t believe I had fit my whole life in there.

But the truth is, I hadn’t. Leaving Wisconsin meant we were leaving my family and my fiancĂ©’s family behind. When we arrived in Boston, I was nervous, would our apartment look like it did in the photos? Would the movers arrive on time? Would our couch fit? It did, they didn’t, it didn’t. I cried. I wanted to go home. My couch didn’t fit and neither did I. This busy city felt new, too new, and not mine. I woke up from a mattress on the floor the next day and reluctantly pulled on my tennis shoes, we had no food yet and I knew I just needed to go for a walk. I walked for hours that morning, a croissant here, a coffee there, I started to recognize streets I passed, I saw my new hospital, I realized the river path was five minutes from our apartment door and I let a long sigh out. I thought it might actually be ok. And it was.



Dr. Brieana Rodriquez: 


My “most extreme” feelings about moving across the country happened before I left. After match day I was so excited to start a new chapter of my life. I was ready! But after classes had finished and I had already bought my new house I was in this weird limbo state. The best way I could describe it was I felt like I had closed the Wisconsin book, but I wasn’t allowed to open the South Carolina book. My anxiety about moving was at an all-time high but it wasn’t because I was scared, it was because I wanted to move but couldn’t. But since I’ve gotten here there’s been nothing but excitement! Meeting my co-residents (and realizing I’d be able to make more best friends) has been so much fun! Exploring a new city has been so cool! When moving cross country for medical school I learned so much about myself. I grew so much personally and I’m ready to start experiencing that again. One of the reasons I chose to rank MUSC #1. Side note: I know the anxiety about starting work is going to kick in soon, but it hasn’t yet. 


Olivia Davies, MD, begins her Dermatology Residency at the Harvard University Combined Program on July 1st in Boston, MA. During her time as an MCW medical student, she was an associate editor of the Transformational Times. 


Brieana Rodriguez, MD, begins her Emergency Medicine Residency at the Medical University of South Carolina on July 1st in Charleston, SC. 

From Medical Student to Trusted Physician: Growing with a Confident Humility

 From the 6/18/2021 newsletter


Director’s Corner

 

 

From Medical Student to Trusted Physician: Growing with a Confident Humility

 

 

Adina Kalet, MD MPH

 

 

Dr. Kalet shares one of the “hidden” tasks that each new resident is facing: the need to develop competence without risking becoming overconfident. She shares some of the pitfalls and invites our newest house staff to be part of the journey.

 

 

This is the time of year when thousands and thousands of newly minted physicians move somewhere to begin residency training. At MCW, we welcome all our new residents, many of whom are moving to Milwaukee for the first time. This is a poignant, anxiety-provoking, and exciting time, a new beginning, and a critical transition on the journey of becoming a seasoned and caring physician.

 

Incoming residents are embarking on the steepest leg of their learning curves. Not only have many of them just moved to a new city, found a new home, and located a new grocery store, each new day brings them an avalanche of firsts: the first patient, the first procedure, and the first time they need to find the cafeteria or the bathroom or the emergency room. Many important components of their new professional identify will take shape in these first summer weeks. Our newest physicians will work to discern how best to balance confidence and humility. Getting this equilibrium right is crucial, and I think MCW is an especially wonderful place to foster this process.

 

The difference between confidence and competence

As physicians on the front line, residents are expected to develop enough confidence to quickly analyze data, make crucial decisions, and act decisively. Think about how difficult and fraught that task can be! We want physicians to make critical judgements under emotionally charged and complex conditions. Even drawing blood for routine laboratory testing (a task interns do daily) means facing an anxious, fearful, suffering person, and causing them some pain. Confidence is critical, yet—to ensure that our teams provide the highest quality and safest health care—we stay on the lookout for overconfidence in ourselves and in others because of the complex and paradoxical relationship between confidence and competence.

The Dunning-Kruger effect, described in 1999, elegantly summarizes this complexity. Stated simply, people with low ability tend to overestimate their competence and, therefore, become overconfident. Conversely, people with high ability tend to be underconfident in their ability. Even worse, poor performers are often unable to recognize their own limitations, and overconfidence is especially pronounced for those at the lowest end of the ability scale. As ability improves with practice, confidence, paradoxically, can take a nose-dive because the difficult journey can create humility and self-awareness. This sense of deflation can feel terrible at the time but, in the long run, is good since it can lead to insight and growth.  

Numerous studies have confirmed that humans are just not good at objectively evaluating their own level of competence, but by honing one’s own metacognitive awareness or being observant—like a scientist—of one’s own thinking and feeling, a novice can guard against using his or her own confidence as an indicator of competence. As teachers, we must avoid making our trust judgements based on a trainee’s confidence alone. As Ronald Reagan was wont to say, we must, “Trust but verify.” Confidence is good, but we must guard against allowing our feelings of confidence to blind us to our own ignorance.

 

 

“Confident humility”

 

In his new book, Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know, organizational psychologist Adam Grant reminds us how critical it is to cultivate a mindset “confident humility.” From this stance, one can act even when they are not certain of what is right, but they act with a scientist’s curiosity and perspective, seeking evidence that might refute their current beliefs. Grant reviews the accumulating evidence that intelligence does not protect us from common human foibles. In fact, many researchers have pointed out that smarter, more tenacious people (like many medical students and residents) are prone to blindness to changing conditions and may have a harder time adjusting to new circumstances. They have difficulty admitting when they are wrong. Stubborn, inflexible physicians will run into obstacles when trying to provide competent, character-driven medical care.
 
If, however, a hypothesis survives repeated attacks, it becomes the working theory until such time as it can be disproven. Approaching one’s own competence in this rigorous way—repeatedly challenging beliefs and understandings—keeps a person humble, curious, adaptable, and learning. It is the key to deep, durable, and lifelong learning. 

 


The remarkable value of working in an institution defined by confident humility

 

Like many of us, I am a transplant from elsewhere, having arrived barely two years ago. I have traveled extensively and have lived and worked in other institutions in the northern and southeastern United States. To my delight, I have come to know MCW as a uniquely confident, humble place to work and learn. It is remarkable to me—given the excellence in clinical care and research—how little our institution tolerates the everyday self-promoting arrogance typical at many of our peer institutions. This institutional culture is a towering strength and I believe is one of the many reasons we have adapted and thrived for a century and a quarter. 

As Mark Twain warned, “It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.” Adam Grant points out that a hallmark of wisdom is knowing when it’s time to rethink and collect data that might refute and, therefore, cause you to abandon what you think you know and who you think you are. This habit of honest reflection and an openness, or even a delight in learning when you are wrong, is a path toward a deeply satisfying confidence. It’s true in business and especially true in medicine.

 

So, to our incoming house staff, I say, “welcome!” You have several difficult tasks ahead, not the least of which is to master your chosen field. You will grow as you learn to work in teams, experience ambiguity, become lifelong learners, and bring your intellect and compassion together to tend the sick and heal the suffering. You will thrive if you tend to your own wellness and character. These are huge tasks responsibilities. We wish you all the best and are here to support you.

 

 

Adina Kalet, MD MPH is the Director of the Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Institute for the Transformation of Medical Education and holder of the Stephen and Shelagh Roell Endowed Chair at the Medical College of Wisconsin.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maintaining your Principles while Moving from One Institution to Another

 From the 6/18/2020 newsletter


Questions for John Raymond, MD



Maintaining your Principles while Moving from One Institution to Another


John R. Raymond, Sr., MD is the President and CEO of MCW. He was born and raised in northeastern Ohio and received his medical degree from The Ohio State University. He completed his residency training and nephrology fellowship at Duke University before joining Duke’s faculty. In 1996, he moved to the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), performing research, caring for patients, and serving as chief of nephrology at the Ralph H. Johnson VAMC, eventually rising to become Associate Provost for Research and, finally, Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost. He was recruited in 2010 to became MCW’s sixth President.

Dr. Raymond has changed institutions during his celebrated career. He recently spoke to Transformational Times editor, Bruce Campbell, about the process of moving and starting fresh.


Transformational Times: What it was like for you to move from South Carolina to MCW?

Dr. Raymond: The move was exciting. Since I grew up in northeast Ohio, moving to Wisconsin felt a lot like coming home. I spent twenty-eight years in the Carolinas, first at Duke and then at MUSC. The people there are great, but the south has a different feel and culture. Moving back to a place that felt more like home was wonderful. It was also exciting to come into the new role here and build on the types of positions I had held before.

Like most people, taking on so many new responsibilities initially led to a sense of “Imposter Syndrome.” There were certainly some early challenges. Before long, though, I settled in and found a supportive, dedicated community.


Transformational Times: In what ways is MCW unique and/or different from other institutions where you have worked?

Dr. Raymond: I learned that people at MCW are unusually modest, and that the institution has many programs could be characterized as having “understated excellence.” Folks are doing wonderful work yet, throughout MCW, I have found that people don’t like to brag and often avoid personal accolades. There is a sense that we all want to do the right thing with a deep sense of collegiality and civility. This trait is culturally deeply engrained. People at other institutions seem to be more likely to seek the limelight.

This natural modesty and natural inclination toward teamwork and mutual support has been a good thing, especially as the institution and country have experienced unprecedented stressors and challenges in the past months. We have a natural proclivity to work together and foster each other’s success.

In addition, I find that the structure of our academic medical center requires me to spend much more of my time intentionally managing relationships than was needed at either Duke or MUSC. I have worked hard to invest in relationships across our partner institutions, sharing perspectives, and intentionally identifying and pursuing shared goals.


Transformational Times: What have you learned about effectively acclimating to a new institution?

Dr. Raymond: With each major move during my career, I tried to remember to be a good listener. I was always asking questions. I made certain that I tried to learn from my experiences every day.

I also worked to identify with my new institution and fully invest in my new opportunities. I found it was rarely helpful to start a sentence with, “But at Duke…” or “We always did this at MUSC.” Those approaches don’t help. I quickly identified with MCW as “us,” rather than as “you.” This allowed me to be curious, engaged, and ready for challenges.

My pathway to the presidency was not traditional since many people in positions like mine have previously been medical school deans or senior department chairs. My background was in running the research enterprise at MUSC and serving as a VA service chief. I think my experiences gave me valuable perspectives into what institutions can and should offer to its wide range of stakeholders and constituents both inside and outside the university.


Transformational Times: Talk about your work with the state’s government.  

I had significant experience working with local and state governments at MUSC where as provost, I also served as a key legislative liaison. Here is Wisconsin, we have had frequent and productive contact with the governor’s office (both with Governor Walker and Governor Evers), the State assembly, the State senate, municipal and county officials, and leaders from both political parties. It is fair to say that Wisconsin’s political landscape is highly partisan. Nevertheless, leaders of both parties have demonstrated strong commitments to MCW and our roles in protecting and improving the wellbeing of the state’s citizens. Our regional campuses and residency programs have also cultivated supporters in other parts of the state.

We are not shy about letting political leaders know what is important to us, but we take a long view perspective of issues. We work behind the scenes when needed. I know that approach can appear hesitant at times, but it has allowed us to be effective and serves us well in the long run.


Transformational Times: What core principles have you worked most diligently to retain with each move?

Dr. Raymond: With each move, I have worked to get to know the institution. For example, I was a reader for Richard Katschke’s new book, Knowledge Changing Life: A History of the Medical College of Wisconsin, 1893-​2019. Highly recommended.

With each move, I re-committed to sharpening my active listening skills and to remembering that no one ever comes to a new job with all the answers.

I realized that I represent the institution with what I say and do. My words and my values have meaning. I strive to be candid, truthful, and respectful. I want to be seen as a leader who has, and acts on, an internal core of integrity.

I have always tried to deliver maximum value to all our stakeholders, including our students, staff, and faculty, as well as our institutional and community partners.

Finally, I have worked hard to show that, as a health sciences university and community partner, we are here to serve others. We must remember we are our best selves when we serve our neighbors who are experiencing disproportionate burdens of disease and who are affected negatively by the social determinants of health. Our allocation of attention and resources must demonstrate that we know that it is critical to serve our communities with compassion.


Transformational Times: What has surprised you?

Dr. Raymond: The process of moving brings mostly positive things. I am always surprised by both the breadth and depth of individual and collective talent when I explore a new institution. I am surprised by the joy of making new personal connections. Those aspects are fun and rewarding.

Recently, I have also been surprised by how our friends and colleagues at MCW reflect the divides that our community and country are also experiencing. The profound, fractious and political divides we see on television also exist here. A diversity of thought and opinion is good for a university, but we must encourage exploration, growth, conversation, and reconciliation. These issues are deeply political for some, and there are many people who feel unwelcome and uncomfortable expressing their points of view. I hope that can change.


If You had a Blank Slate, How Would You Integrate Narrative into Medical Education?

From the 6/18/2021 newsletter


Three Questions for Dr. Deepthiman Gowda


If You had a Blank Slate, How Would You Integrate Narrative into Medical Education?


Deepthiman Gowda, MD MPH MS, is a nationally recognized expert on Narrative Medicine and the founding Assistant Dean for Medical Education at the newly opened Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine in Pasadena CA. He spoke to Transformational Times editor, Bruce Campbell …


Transformational Times: In what ways is narrative integrated into the curriculum at the Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine? 

Dr. Gowda: The School of Medicine's curriculum was intentionally built on the three co-equal pillars of the Biomedical, Clinical, and Health Systems Sciences. By emphasizing the value of deep dives into health systems along with the other disciplines, students discover that organ dysfunction, illness, and suffering always occur within social and societal contexts, and that nuanced and effective “doctor-patient relationships” require students to understand and address often obscure, external forces. Through our “spiral” model of learning, students revisit these key areas and concepts repeatedly and with increasing sophistication throughout the four years. 

In addition, we identified core values we consider essential for meaningful participation in high-functioning healthcare and turned these into four reappearing curricular “threads.” These are: 

    • Equity, Inclusion, and Diversity
    • Health Promotion
    • Interprofessional Collaboration 
    • Advocacy and Leadership

Narrative Medicine and its pedagogical cousins fit nicely within this curricular approach.  For example, patients are often powerfully affected by the social determinants of health and experience their illnesses and healthcare interactions within larger narrative frameworks. These moments provide wonderful opportunities for our students to explore and respond to stories. On a personal level, providers benefit when they have guided, protected time to investigate their own narratives. Finally, interprofessional teams and interpersonal relationships function better when people understand each other’s stories. 

To enable these moments, we built many opportunities for narrative into our curriculum. We worked with the foundational scientists and clinicians to provide narrative opportunities at “moments of attention,” such as with cadaver dissection, pelvic and breast exam sessions, and challenging experiences. Over the four years, each student participates in regular REACH sessions (Reflection, Education, Assessment, Coaching, Health and Well-Being), that occur in one-week blocks, four times each in Years One and Two and three time each in Years Three and Four. REACH incorporates dedicated time to explore health, well-being, and resilience skills. Students participate in close reading, writing-to-a-prompt, and conversation, facilitated by trained faculty mentors who remain with the same groups of six students throughout the four years. The sessions also include goal setting, professional identity formation activities, and the creation of critical reflective essays. 


Transformational Times: How have the students taken to this emphasis on narrative in the curriculum? 

Dr. Gowda: Students these days expect curricula to address health systems issues in ways that were not explored in the past. There was great local and national engagement around the Black Lives Matter movement and how implicit bias is manifest in medicine. Our school is small, only about fifty students per class, but the learners are enthusiastic about narrative opportunities. About one-quarter are part of our Medical Humanities Interest Group, for example. The M2s will soon head to one of the local art museums. 

Student-led initiatives have been key. For example, the students organized StoryTime, a monthly storytelling event that is much like The Moth. Each event includes volunteer student, staff, and faculty storytellers and is built around a theme, such as Solidarity, Community, or Mental Health. These events provide a glue for our community. 


Transformational Times: What barriers are there to incorporating narrative meaningfully into the curriculum?

Dr. Gowda: Well, first of all, it is relatively simple to bring narrative to topics such as well-being, professional identity formation, and diversity & inclusion. Students understand the inherent value of reflecting on - and learning from - their own experiences and struggles. For these types of narrative experiences, they engage easily. 

Other areas of study can be more challenging. Employing narrative techniques to unwrap broader issues within health systems science are also valuable but can be difficult, particularly when trying to make sense of large, amorphous structures and bureaucracies. Finding ways to integrate narrative into foundational sciences can be the most difficult, requiring commitment and engagement by both faculty and students. But it can be done. 

All of us in the field struggle with metrics. In other words, how do we demonstrate the value of narrative in the curriculum? There are rubrics for scoring reflective activities, but we don’t always know if they are measuring what we think they are. We also worry that if students believe they are being “graded” on their reflections, that might suck the joy out of the process. Reflection fatigue is real, and students are smart enough to “write to the test,” even with reflective essays. 

We need to understand the students’ growth along the spectrum - as my colleague at Columbia University, Maura Spiegel, describes - between “thin” and “thick” narratives. In this sense, growth occurs when students demonstrate shifts from stories that focus on a single aspect of identity to stories that reflect multiple points of view and enriched contexts. The ability to create these “thickened narratives” might be important in understanding our learners’ narrative progress and competence. 

As they graduate, we need to make certain that our efforts have helped them become compassionate, team-based, and resilient physicians who possess narrative humility. We believe narrative is part of that, but we are still deciding how best to understand and measure progress in a competency-based system.


The transformation of medical education is a difficult but necessary challenge. I have been here at Kaiser Permanente for two years and have never worked harder in my career. It is a huge, exciting task and there is much left to do. 

 


Deepthiman Gowda, MD MPH MS, is the Assistant Dean for Medical Education and Associate Professor of Medicine at the Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine. He also serves at the Director of Clinical Practice of the Columbia University Irving Medical Center Division of Narrative Medicine.